Vault IdeaStation
Share your wish list directly with the Autodesk Vault Development Team
New Idea
3 Kudos

Copy ECO Routing

Status: Future Consideration
by bverboort on ‎08-08-2013 02:43 PM

I'd like to be able to copy an existing ECO routing

1 Kudo

Copy Number Schemes

Status: Under Review
by bverboort on ‎08-08-2013 02:41 PM

I'd like to be able to "Copy" an existing File, Item and/or ECO numbering scheme

Status: Under Review
4 Kudos

Add method to Show/Hide option/filter for Vault file status icons in Inventor Model Browser

Status: Solution Provided
Why do you want to hide the status icons?
11 Kudos

If we have a file with security based on Groups you will encounter a problem:


SALES can only see RELEASED

ENGINEERING can see Everything


When the file in REV.A and Released State is send to Work in Progress, the people from SALES does not see the file any more.

They should have the ability to see the Released File, while Engineering is working on an improvement or modification

Status: Accepted
0 Kudos

Need an Event on Item Revision Change

Status: Accepted
by ADN Support Specialist on ‎06-19-2013 05:46 AM

(On behalf of an ADN partner)

We need to get a notification when the Revision of an Item is changed.

Status: Accepted
Who will get the events and why?
1 Kudo

Reporting creation

Status: Future Consideration
by *Expert Elite* | International Moderator on ‎06-17-2013 07:04 AM

Add an ability to create reports based even on same RDLC, but via API.

0 Kudos

Exporting Of "Uses" List in Vault

Status: Solution Provided
by *Expert Elite* on ‎04-22-2013 12:31 PM

Not sure how often this comes up for other users, but where I work it comes up a fair amount.

If there was a way to export out the detailed list of uses for an assembly out of vault, say into a notepad file this would be useful.  I know this functionality is not in workgroup.  If it is in Pro please funnel this function down to lower versions.  :smileyhappy:

2 Kudos

Multi-select lists for properties

Status: Accepted
by Valued Contributor tmoney2007 on ‎04-19-2013 09:23 AM

Going through an implementation of vault, the lack of the option for a multi-list as a property type is very limiting when it comes to integration.


This may be a limitation that stems from matching the capability of the authoring tools, but those could stand to be updated as well.  Alternatively, there could be a translation that would take a comma separated list in a property or attribute into a multi-list property.

Status: Accepted
0 Kudos

I have had my VAR in and there was no solution currently for this.

When we had the revision in the rev table on the drawing being driven by Vault, the previous rev line would revert to the newly created revision.  We would have to manually change it back and update the new line to the current rev.  There is an obvious glitch in the software that is causing this.

What should happen is when the vault is driving the revision block the new revision row comes in and not only shows the newly created rev, but leaves previous revision lines as they were.

This condition also seems to exist for the description.  In general it seems like there is a communication issue between this revision block and vault.

Status: Accepted
Hi Cadmanto, This does not sound right - please advise if you have been able to resolve this with support - it sounds as though this is a table created with a reference to the document revision value rather than using Vault Revision table integration.
24 Kudos

More Intuitive Error Messages

Status: Accepted
by *Expert Elite* on ‎03-29-2013 06:38 AM

Can we please be a little more descriptive in the error messages?

I get a message that tells me I cannot move a specific file in the vault from one location to another.

The message reads "File Cannot be moved"  looking at the details it says "File could not be moved due to vault error"

Really?  Why couldn't it have explained to the detail of saying one of the factory files was checked out causing this file not to be moved.  This is just one example.  I would like to see all messages be a little more descriptive.


Side note.  I would like to see less messages as well.  That is more of how the software is written though.

Probably a different idea for a different day.  :smileyhappy:

Status: Accepted
You are not logged in.

Log into access your profile, ask and answer questions, share ideas and more. Haven't signed up yet? Register

IdeaStation Guidelines
Review guidelines and best practices
before posting a new idea
Top Kudoed Authors
User Kudos Count