Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by AlbertoTorres. Go to Solution.
Solved by AlbertoTorres. Go to Solution.
Hello, Alberto,
Thanks for letting us know the issue. Are you saying only inserting this component( IPE80 Recto.zip) into factory layout at the first time will have the performance issue? Is that mean inserting other component doesn't have issue?
Is that fine to share the data to us?
If yes, my email address is irene.tang@autodesk.com
thanks,
Irene
Hi there,
Yes, that will take a little bit low performance when you place an asset for the first time.
But it is not saying that will be taking 20 minuts. We will take a close look at the issue.
Did you have a try in English version?
Thanks,
-Xuesong
Hello, Alberto,
we have tested on your data based on English version of FDS 2015, we didn't experience the slow performance as you. And the option of 'Start the Relocate command after inserting a Component ' doesn't introduce much difference in the performance.
We are planning to test on German version of FDS 2015, because we dont have Spanish version on hand.
And I am requesting localization team if they can test it on Spanish version.
As Xuesong mentioned , the first place of Asset is really taking a little longer time than following same Asset placement but not too much difference.
thanks,
Irene
hi there,
Marvelous!
Thank you very, very ,very much for letting us know the reason and solution.
We will log the issue in our backlog system. It is worhty investigating the issue and fixing it in the future.
Thanks,
-Xuesong
Is it just placing a Factory asset that is very slow? How about placing a regular part using Inventor's native Place Component command?
Hello, Alverto,
I tried to repro the issue by the way: In project setting, go to workgroup search paths to add one server path. Under this path there are more than 30 sub-folders.
Then new a layout and place one system asset from Asset libray. But the performance is no difference.
Yes, maybe 30 is too few comparing to your 300,000 subfolders. However ss my way right to re-pro the issue?
thanks,
Irene