Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by Pennetier1. Go to Solution.
Solved by Pennetier1. Go to Solution.
Solved by Pennetier1. Go to Solution.
Solved by Pennetier1. Go to Solution.
Hi Stella,
I have just ran some tests, i.e. using an analysis grid on two identical models, but different North orientations. I ran the DAYSIM calculation, and indeed, the model with the offset North creates a second *.pts file named *.pts.rotated.pts, which DAYSIM uses for calculations. You can open these files in a text editor to look at the changes between the two files.
After DAYSIM calculations are done, I have re-imported various *.DA files into Ecotect.
1. When importing back the Daylight Factor.DA files, there are almost no differences between the results. You may expect a difference since the orientation of the model is different, however, this makes sense to me since Daylight Factor is typically calculated under Overcast Sky conditions, whereas the orientation of the model should not have any consequences, since there are no sun in the sky.
2. When importing back the Dayligh Autonomy.DA files, there are also almost no difference. I am not sure if the calculation uses the daylight factor or the illuminance values. If the daylight autonomy uses the daylight factor values, then it makes sense again. When Ecotect calculates Daylight Autonomy (under the calculate menu > Advanced Daylighting), it requires and uses Daylight Factor values.
3. When importing the other type of files, such as the Useful Daylight index files, the values are quite different, which would make sense if using typical illuminance values (not daylight factors).
I am still not sure what the issue is with your file, please zip and attach to this forum or email me directly.
Although you can assign names to objects such as sensor points, you cannot do the same for sensor points belonging to an analysis grid.
I hope we can resolve your problem soon.
Cheers,
Hi Stella, Niya,
I think part of the problem comes from the fact that when Ecotect re-imports the *.DA file from DAYSIM, it reads only the results of each analysis point without looking at the actual coordinate from the file. Thus, for Ecotect, the value of the first point is on the first line of the *.DA file, and assigns that value to the first bottom left corner point of the analysis. The problem is that DAYSIM rotates the *.pts file and assign new coordinates, which are not read by Ecotect.
Are you having the issue only when you are off-setting the North arrow?
One way around this might be to edit your *.DA file. These files show the coordinates of each grid points and their value. You can open the *.DA files with a simple text editor, by changing the extension from *.DA to *.txt.
I am not sure if that is what you were trying to do - truthfully I am not quite sure what you are trying to do or analyze! Daylight factors should always be the same regardless of the orientation of your model, since it is calculated using an Overcast Sky.
Regarding only using some points instead of the whole grid, I am not sure I understand either; Ecotect calculates the daylighting over the entire grid (whether or not you see it), then displays only certain grid points. These grid points can be turned off (hide) or turn on (show) using the "Select Grid Nodes" button at the bottom of the Analysis Grid control panel. The script I have written for you does just that: it turns off certain random points on the existing grid; you can of course do this manually.
Maybe if you email me or attach here a *.zip file of your Ecotect models, it would be more helpful for me to understand your problem.
Cheers,
Hi Niya and Stella,
Glad you were able to make it work! It sounds like a lot of work though.
I would still like to figure out the issue from within Ecotect without having to go through some other tools...
Could you send me your *.eco file where the issue appears? I would like to give it a go again, at least try to replicate the issue on my end, which I have been unsuccessful here.
Cheers