On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:04:48 +0000, Todd W wrote:
>What's everybodys preferences. Does TTF slow the system down?
Not nearly as much as they used to.
In short:
TTF Pros:
1. They always plot perfectly, at every scale. You don't have to deal with layer
color or lineweight. This right here is worth the price fo admission.
2. Most of the ones you normally use are installed in AutoCAD already, so you
don't need to deal with installing them or referring to a Fonts folder in the
Support path.
3. When using standard Windows fonts (Arial), any recipients will have them on
their machines, which means you do not need to send them via eTransmit.
4. Unicode is fully supported in TTF fonts.
5. TTF fonts do not have special characters (stacked fractions) which means you
cannot do certain things the way you used to. The good thing is that neither can
anyone else, which increases compatibility across team members.
TTF Cons:
1. They may work slightly slower than vector-based SHX fonts. However, with
modern PCs this has not been an issue for use in many years. Older versions
specifically had issues with TTF fonts in Xrefs, but I have not seen this issue
lately.
2. Any custom fonts you may use need to be specifically installed per machine,
not simply dumped in a Fonts folder on a server. This is easy enough to do,
however.
3. Custom fonts would need to be sent via eTransmit; as with any custom font,
this may have copyright issues to deal with. TTF font files tend to be very
heavy as well, increasing transmission package file size.
4. Custom fonts will not be displayed in the MText editor properly.
5. If you have "Font smoothing" enabled in Windows, text in the MText editor
looks like crap. This is IMO an Autodesk issue.
Matt
mstachoni@comcast.net
mstachoni@bhhtait.com