While the issue of using CTBs over STBs and vice versa is getting the
most attention, I thought I'd aswer your question.
There is simply no reason to assign pen weights based on increasing
ACI color number (meaning red = color 1 = "pen 1", yellow = pen 2,
etc) in increasing pen thicknesses.
Autodesk assigned the ACI numbers almost arbitrarily, and they were
never meant to be assigned to pen thicknesses in this way, at least
not intentionally.
You should assign pen weights based on what you want to see on screen.
I know people who have a hard time seeing red on a black screen, but a
gray or white background is equally unacceptable because of the use of
Yellow. So why assign a hard to see color to a "popular" pen weight?
Pick colors and pen assignments based on how you want the drawings to
look on screen for maximum user comfort, and screw the ACI color
number as a guide. People will get used to it.
Matt
mstachoni@comcast.net
mstachoni@bhhtait.com
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:22:43 -0800, "Scott Reid"
wrote:
>I need help convincing my companies main office to change our company
>standard pen mappings on .ctb files.
>
>What is considered "Main Stream" as far as pen weights for the primary 9
>colors in a .ctb. Meaning, how many of you start with color 1 (red) as the
>thickest and go thinner down the list to color 9?
>
>
>Any help from you guys (or gals) would be great....
>