Absolutely NO for most of the reasons given. You can't manage what you don't
understand.
I'd add that whoever "manages" a CAD department also has a mandatory need to
know all about the product or service in question ... whatever it is the
department is cadding.
The worst situation I've seen, in the architectural world, was when a young
intern with about a year's experience was in charge of the "standards"
including CAD setup, file naming, drawing organization and numbering, etc.
He knew a fair amount about AutoCAD, but what he created was horribly
inefficient and wrong.
Because he had no background of project experience, no perspective on how
things are done in a number of different offices, no judgement on what's
normal vs. weird, no insight on how CAD and computers were evolving, just
basically no acculmulated "wisdom" on architectural practice.
If you're doing architecture (for instance), the CAD manager needs to be 1)
highly knowledgeable about architecture, 2) highly knowledgeable about the
CAD software, 3) reasonably knowledgeable about networking, hardware, etc.
CAD's only a tool. Being familiar with the tool itself doesn't automatically
give you any knowledge about what you're trying to use the tool for.
Russ wrote in message
news:6F3644EF739D4D5E27FE7F0F9FDE26F9@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Here's a Question for the experts. Is experince with AutoCAD nessecary
to
> manage a CAD Department? What if someone is an IT Wiz but dosn't know
> anything aout AutoCAD? Could they still run it effectivly?
>
>