except this is using low tech mixed with hi tech used to achieve a very low
resolution surface model.
I prefer lasers for this and see that technology as a far more interesting
way to go.
yeah - we could get little cars to move around and shine lights and create
a giant 2-d display or we could use LED's...
http://www.physorg.com/news11251.html
http://www.funhous3.com/673/Cheoptics_360___Free_floating_3D_laser_display/
just because I don't dance to *your* tune doesn't make me not *in* tune.
--
TDP
First things first, but not necessarily in that order.
The Doctor
"clintonG" wrote in message
news:6347010@discussion.autodesk.com...
Some of us heard this same type of objections and pigeon-hole mentality back
in the day when 2D CAD first emerged. Some of us even remember it was often
called 2-1/2D CAD as a means to convey what we imagined to be possible as we
tried to fake what our software could not yet make happen.
A lot has changed since then but some things and some types of people never
change so I'm not surprised to continue to observe many of you are clearly
devoid of any imagination and remain dull and insipid drafters with low to
no skills "managing" the drawing of toilet room partitions while some of us
relish the experience of being involved and participating in discovering and
using technology for all its worth.
"The Dark Princess" wrote in message
news:6346756@discussion.autodesk.com...
I would never waste my time on something like that - it is better spent on
doing things that actually help people and not revolving around 'see what I
can do now by buying neat stuff that other people created and putting it
together in a novel way resulting in something remarkably useless'
--
TDP
First things first, but not necessarily in that order.
The Doctor
"clintonG" wrote in message
news:6346205@discussion.autodesk.com...
You mean you can write better code? Show me... then I'll be impressed.
"The Dark Princess" wrote in message
news:6345975@discussion.autodesk.com...
dude. I'm still not impressed. and i had such high hopes.
--
TDP
First things first, but not necessarily in that order.
The Doctor
"clintonG" wrote in message
news:6345545@discussion.autodesk.com...
Yea hey? It will be amazing when it goes nano.
"Patrick Berry" wrote in message
news:6342478@discussion.autodesk.com...
I think it's pretty cool. They've got some serious technical issues to
overcome, but the technology required to overcome them would have tremendous
benfits beyond creating a floating display. I see some serendipity in their
future. 🙂