style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"OLD-CADaver" <
href="mailto:rculp@chicagobridge.com">rculp@chicagobridge.com> wrote in
message
href="news:f1a296f.9@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f1a296f.9@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> your opinion stinks.<<
Gee, the post from Dean I read said " this one person will either
eventually join in, or move on."
We keep people who wish to be part of the team. We need people to do
whatever it takes when the chips are down to get the job out. That means
training, teaching and sharing with the other team members. If they don't wish
to be part of the team they need to work
elsewhere.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"hpcapers" <My
href="mailto:harry.capers@fluor.com">harry.capers@fluor.com> wrote in
message
href="news:f1a296f.13@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f1a296f.13@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
$.02 is that if you share, you are not afraid of someone else's talents or
growth. It is imperative to the department to grow. If you work on your own
(from home for example), your learning gets muted. When you are in a group of
people (cad group), you learn fropm everyone.
We had people here that were sharp and shared - others did not. The team
players usually shine, while non-team players ususally weed themselves out.
Not that all loners are useless, quite the opposite - it is up to the
manager to see each individuals value and expertise and use it to the best of
the project.
I have learned from cad experts and cad amateurs. We all can't be Indian
chiefs.....