Community
AutoCAD MEP Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s AutoCAD MEP Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular AutoCAD MEP topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

total friction loss

22 REPLIES 22
Reply
Message 1 of 23
Anonymous
1600 Views, 22 Replies

total friction loss

Hello again,
I do not see where is the total friction loss for the system, so I can chouse a fan. (HVAC system).
Thank you in advance for the answer
22 REPLIES 22
Message 2 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

the software doesn't do system static loss. and be careful with the given static losses because the software also doesn't take into account the aspect ratio of the duct.
Message 3 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

So when you design fan based system (HVAC). How did you choose which fan to use? The fan must meet the pressure loss of the system.
Message 4 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Back to good old paper and pencil calculations. then modify the fan after to match selection made.
Message 5 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

What is the purpose of drawing the system by 1-line duck and then calculate the system?
Message 6 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

In the ductadd dialog box under duct shape is a "Undefined" choice. This
allows the user to draw single line, un-sized, duct at specified
elevations. Many companies have a DD phase (Design Development) and a
CD phase (Construction Document)...I've seen these names a bit different
at different companies, but what you do in these phases are essentially
the same. In DD, the Architects are still (Ok, they never stop)
changing the layout...well, they slow down and make minor ones in CD,
but they do slow down enough engineers can solidify their design in CD
phase. So, back to DD phase, layouts are changing and engineering wants
to schematically show their concept of where the duct is going to route,
where diffusers go, where & what equipment is planned. Sizes are added
as the design is refined and knowledge is gained. Some sections may be
sized at different times. Until the engineer knows the CFM's at
diffusers and equipment, the duct can remain "Un-defined" single line.
It serves it's purpose to coordinate and plan duct routes with other
disciplines...and it is a placeholder so that down the road (closer to
CD phase or in CD) when CFMs are better known, the duct can be very
quickly sized and in 3D...one button click. There's always engineering
judgment and tweaks required, but the sizer roughs it it in saving time.

The duct size dialog looks at the duct system setting to get the
friction and velocities for that type of system or you can override them
at the sizer dialog. You can select a section of duct to size or do the
whole thing. Any connected diffusers need to know their CFM's prior to
sizing the section of duct. In the sizer dialog, you can specify the max
height for oval ducts and max diameter for round. You can set all
diffuser branches to get their shape and size from the diffuser allowing
mains to be what you specify. There are many options in the sizer to
quickly get the duct size and shape where you want. Click of a button
will take your selected duct from Un-defined to fully sized and you can
always check it with a ductulator...even though, I've found that there
are subtle differences between different manufacturer's ductulators.
We've compared our results to each of the various different ASHRAE
sizing methods and we're close. We are also, like other features,
continuously making improvements, which as an Autodesk employee, I
cannot tell you when or what you may see in a future release. Ideas and
wish items are always welcome.

If you do not like a size, the built-in sizer is best used as a quick
"Rough-in"...it gets most of the duct sizes close to what is expected
and it's up to the engineer/tech to do the due diligence, checking
sizes. When or if a change is desired, the duct can be selected on and
manually changed, or re-run the sizer.
Hope this answers your question.

Joshua Benoist, PE (Autodesk)

ptodorov wrote:
> What is the purpose of drawing the system by 1-line duck and then calculate the system?
>
Message 7 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

that answer 1 question, but still.
In many countries there is a specifics workflow to do a sizing:
1. Make flow load for the building (system)calculation (on external application or by hand)
2. Make flow load for each room (diffuser)
3. Connect the diffusers whit ducts (make the 1-line duct design)
4. Find room for the fan (choosing the fan by 2 variables - friction loss (this value we do not know yet) and flow demand for the system (we know the flow demand from point 1)
5. Make sizing calculation (depending by friction loss and speed of the air). Common there is limitation for the speed of the air in the ducts. This limitation is a variable in different countries.
6. When we have the friction losses for the each branches in the system (from calculations in point 5), we choose the biggest number (the branch whit biggest friction loss), and that number is the friction loss for fan choosing.
7. Choosing the type of fan by pressure (meeting the friction loss from point 6) and by air flow demands (point 1).

My question is how to do this whit Building Systems?
Message 8 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

You have several choices.
Draw the duct Undefined 1-line originally and then over time, manually
change the duct branch sizes as you perform your outlined workflow
mentioned below.
Draw the duct arbitrarily in 2-line originally, set the display to
single line duct so the 2-line duct displays as single line. Manually
change the duct size as you perform your workflow mentioned below.
Don't use the duct sizer or use it on one duct section at a time. The
built-in systems do have settings for friction and velocity "speed of
the air" that you can change to meet your countries limitation. You can
size the various duct branches till you find the one with the greatest
loss and then go back and size the fan. The engineer selects the
fan...not ABS. ABS cannot do that for you. It will only size duct. In
the end, the engineer must design the building system. Autodesk provides
the duct sizer to rough-in sizes thus saving time, not to do the
engineering for you. That being said, the duct sizer will size the duct
how you asked in step 5. It's not a fan or equipment sizer.
Look in the duct systems to set the friction and velocities "speed of air."
Run the sizer on a section of duct to get a size. You will need to
figure out the loss for that section.
We do not have a built-in friction loss calculation tool.
Eventually you'll find the section with the greatest loss allowing you
to size the fan.
I believe this is how you would do this with Building Systems.
Hope this answers your question.
Joshua Benoist, PE (Autodesk)

ptodorov wrote:
> that answer 1 question, but still.
> In many countries there is a specifics workflow to do a sizing:
> 1. Make flow load for the building (system)calculation (on external application or by hand)
> 2. Make flow load for each room (diffuser)
> 3. Connect the diffusers whit ducts (make the 1-line duct design)
> 4. Find room for the fan (choosing the fan by 2 variables - friction loss (this value we do not know yet) and flow demand for the system (we know the flow demand from point 1)
> 5. Make sizing calculation (depending by friction loss and speed of the air). Common there is limitation for the speed of the air in the ducts. This limitation is a variable in different countries.
> 6. When we have the friction losses for the each branches in the system (from calculations in point 5), we choose the biggest number (the branch whit biggest friction loss), and that number is the friction loss for fan choosing.
> 7. Choosing the type of fan by pressure (meeting the friction loss from point 6) and by air flow demands (point 1).
>
> My question is how to do this whit Building Systems?
>
Message 9 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

One question more. Where is displayed friction loss for the system (branch)?
Message 10 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

I mentioned before, ABS does not have a pressure loss calculator. You
must do the calculation yourself.
ABS will size the duct based on the friction/100 feet and velocity. You
can determine the pressure loss from the final size, length and various
fittings.
Is this a wishlist item users would like to see in some future release?
I'll be glad to pass the suggestion on to the appropriate people.
Hope this helps.
Joshua Benoist, PE (Autodesk)

ptodorov wrote:
> One question more. Where is displayed friction loss for the system (branch)?
>
Message 11 of 23
abmeador
in reply to: Anonymous

Yes, please put this on the wishlist. Many of my engineers are asking for a pressure loss calculator/friction loss.

Thank you!
Message 12 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

HI
you can get the Total Pressure Loss
and other related items such as friction factor/ velocity pressure
duct equivalent diameters etc

just try to make property set definitions from the formula you use for the calculations

i did the same and i am getting 100% results

only to assign Flow rate(M3/Hr.) i used the manual data addition method in Property set definition
we can get the Flow rate from the ABS automatically but that needs us to use duct Sizer.

try to Work it out , u will get what u need

Other things which i am getting is Duct Weight with Duct gauges
best of Luck

Thanks

Vijay Kumar Raina
Omnix International ,Dubai
Message 13 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

That's great,
Can you attach your file just to see how you did that things. Thanks in advance
Message 14 of 23
saudek
in reply to: Anonymous

i want to see, too.

thanks.
Message 15 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

I have engineers looking for something simple (not a custom property set definition) that they can click on a run of duct and get total friction loss. Runlength speeds up thier process, but if we can get them from having to do manual friction loss calculations would be best.

Josh - Is this a planned addition for MEP 08?
Message 16 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

JCook,
We cannot speak to what may or may not be in the next release or the future.
Wish we could give more info. I have passed the suggestions on to the
appropriate people.
Joshua Benoist, PE (Autodesk)

JCook wrote:
> I have engineers looking for something simple (not a custom property set definition) that they can click on a run of duct and get total friction loss. Runlength speeds up thier process, but if we can get them from having to do manual friction loss calculations would be best.
>
> Josh - Is this a planned addition for MEP 08?
>
Message 17 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi Josh,
I wonder when we will touch 2008 release, Other products like AutoCAD Architecture and AutoCAD Civil 3D 2008 is already released for testing and runing on my colleagues computers.
When we can expect 2008 release of ABS?
Message 18 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Check out the links in this thread: http://discussion.autodesk.com/thread.jspa?threadID=542810

One of them has release dates for the various products.
Message 19 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

That's another subject we cannot disclose any specifics on. There are
numerous posts in these newsgroups that mention when, in the past,
Autodesk has released each various product. Your best bet is to search
the arch-desktop newsgroup for those threads.
Joshua Benoist, PE (Autodesk)

ptodorov wrote:
> Hi Josh,
> I wonder when we will touch 2008 release, Other products like AutoCAD Architecture and AutoCAD Civil 3D 2008 is already released for testing and runing on my colleagues computers.
> When we can expect 2008 release of ABS?
>
Message 20 of 23
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

I see now bcpratt beat me. I'm not going to speak to how accurate
information from that link is, so please don't ask. He does have a
direct link to the thread and apparently I was off a bit, the thread I
was thinking of is in this newsgroup.
Joshua

Joshua Benoist PE [Autodesk] wrote:
> That's another subject we cannot disclose any specifics on. There are
> numerous posts in these newsgroups that mention when, in the past,
> Autodesk has released each various product. Your best bet is to search
> the arch-desktop newsgroup for those threads.
> Joshua Benoist, PE (Autodesk)
>
> ptodorov wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>> I wonder when we will touch 2008 release, Other products like AutoCAD Architecture and AutoCAD Civil 3D 2008 is already released for testing and runing on my colleagues computers.
>> When we can expect 2008 release of ABS?
>>
>>

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report

”Boost