Community
AutoCAD MEP Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s AutoCAD MEP Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular AutoCAD MEP topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Pipe Gap

10 REPLIES 10
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 11
JonGaspar
2581 Views, 10 Replies

Pipe Gap

AMEP NOOB: I need to add an eigth inch weld gap at each connection. I have searched forums, the 3 1/2" thick manual and I am coming up "0". Can some one please lay some wisdom apon me in how to do this?

Thank you!

James K "Soaring Eagle" Linderman

Spirit Warrior, Chickasaw Tribe.Pipe.gap.in.red.

Tags (3)
10 REPLIES 10
Message 2 of 11
Joshua.Benoist
in reply to: JonGaspar

Hi,

 

Try this:

It is a bit of a workaround that involves editing the xml files for the parts catalogs.  You need to put in a negative 1/16”  offset in the CEL1 and CEL2 (connection engagement length) fields so that flanges actually will have a 1/8” gap in between themselves, faking in a weld or gasket.  It will be tedious to edit every one of the flange xml files to put in the CEL values.  There is no built-in method to add gaskets, though it would be a great feature.  You should log a wish at the feedback site:

 

If you would take the time to go here: http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/index?siteID=123112&id=1109794

 

This is a feedback page where customers can make suggestions. This page is monitored by product managers who affect real change and this request can go a long way in changing the product for the better.

 



Joshua Benoist, PE
Senior Premium Services Specialist
Global Services
Autodesk, Inc.

Message 3 of 11
JonGaspar
in reply to: Joshua.Benoist

Ok, that sucked. But I did find that you actually have to put a -0.125 on each connection point and they over lap each other. I just hope I didn't mess nothing up. I waas batching it and there was a LOT of entries. But, they look pretty cool so far.

 

gap.test.jpeg

Tags (3)
Message 4 of 11
JonGaspar
in reply to: JonGaspar

okay, apperantly I missed something.. =0)

 

gap.test.2.jpeg

Tags (3)
Message 5 of 11
Joshua.Benoist
in reply to: JonGaspar

If you are trying to render the weld gap, then all may need is to toss in a thin solid disc and assign a material.  If the goal was to just have and schedule dimensionally accurate pipe lengths, the the xml suggestion would be all you need.  Often times the gap is too small to see on a plan view drawing, so the gap is drowned out.  When we see support cases, it's just the schedules that people are more concerned with.  Gaskets are another issue.  Their thickness can add up quickly and make a pipe system off by a inch or more.  It sounds as though you are interested in rendering.  Maybe the solids suggestion is all that is needed to tweak the image?



Joshua Benoist, PE
Senior Premium Services Specialist
Global Services
Autodesk, Inc.

Message 6 of 11
JonGaspar
in reply to: Joshua.Benoist

nah, I need the 1/8" gap to show up in drawings. I just threw the render in to to show that which I was getting.

=0)

Message 7 of 11
JonGaspar
in reply to: JonGaspar

the reason is, my welders get confused if they can't see the gap and I get tired off adjusting the pipe lengths to get the gap. I prefer the click click drop done thing, that I convinsed my employer was the reason I wanted MEP instead of vanilla AutoCAD.

Message 8 of 11
Joshua.Benoist
in reply to: JonGaspar

Once the XML files for the content is adjusted, then it will be permanent.  Any new pipe in drawings will be click click done.  The Gap will be there, it simply will not have any meat between the gap.



Joshua Benoist, PE
Senior Premium Services Specialist
Global Services
Autodesk, Inc.

Message 9 of 11

Another method would be to create a parametric coupling that is 1/8 long that has a butt weld connectin on either end.  Then in your pipe routing preferences, you would change your connector from <butt welded> to your new parametric coupling.  This would allow you to schedule your welds and count/number them easily.  If your gap was to change from 1/8 to something else for whatever reason, your coupling is parametric and could easily be changed once and in one location vs going back and rediting all of the xml files for every fitting.

 

Just a thought on an alternate way of doing it.

Message 10 of 11

Looks like an old post, but is this feature even possible in the latest release of 2019 MEP?

 

I have the same issue with Ductile Iron Pipe work. I need 1.5mm gap at each end to allow for gaskets between parts

Message 11 of 11
joshua.giffen
in reply to: joe.mccrory


@joe.mccrory wrote:

Looks like an old post, but is this feature even possible in the latest release of 2019 MEP?

 

 


Just tried doing this with buttweld fittings. I had to make my weld gap a "connector" and change the connections on the fittings to "undefined", but it inserted in the gaps between the piping and fittings.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report

”Boost