Not trying to be a butt, but I can only assume that a legitimate product that enhances the abilities of LT doesn't necessarily violate anything in the EULA. If it did, I don't doubt that autodesk would have the offenders in court immediately. Therefore, to say something IS a violation might be incorrect, unless backed up by actual court case references regarding the offending product. Perhaps it is better to say something MAY be a violation and to advise to read the EULA is all I was getting at...
I hope my info was useful, but if by some odd chance it actually solved your issue, feel free to mark your post as "Accept as Solution". Thanks! 🙂