This is not a new question as I have noticed. What is new about mine is that I am using ACAD LT so a LISP will do no good. I need to layout an array vertically on one irregular path but need the spacing between objects to be the same in the vertical direction (straight path for spacing).
I look forward to comments.
THanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by hwalker. Go to Solution.
Hi @aglezb,
Do you mean a fixed value between objects similar to the value I have set in my array? Or am I misunderstanding your question. Can you provide an example?
Please select the Accept as Solution button if my post solves your issue or answers your question.
Hi Alberto,
Your attachment didn't make it onto your post. If you are adding it by a mobile device such as a phone or tablet, please try again at your computer. I look forward to helping you on this issue.
john.vellek,
I see your example. Tried and didn't work for me. The effect is that all the blocks does not have the same spacing between them since path array measures that distance along the path and I need that distance as a constant value along Y axis regardless of the path shape.
Sounds like you need to do a vertical array and then move them manually into position using a combination of INTERSECT snaps and POLAR TRACKING
Howard Walker
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
Howard Walker
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
hwalker
I see. Yes, this is pretty much like my square 1, i.e. that is what I have been doing up to now with this kind of exercises but without using the polar tracking and turning the orthomode on instead.
I appreciate your collaboration and still look forward for a more "automated" solution since most of the time these arrays get pretty large.
Thanks much!
Unfortunately the way I've shown is probably the best way to go.
There is no easy way to automate it, because what you're trying to do is copy an object from(Original X, Y) to (Variable X, Y+ fixed distance)
Howard Walker
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.