Hey Jim;
For various reasons (the one you point out being one of the higher reasons)
you will find that sub-assemblies are not user-friendly.
My number one reason for not using them is that they don't accept point
codes, and therefore have no use for Road Output Extension, or any other way
for getting points or breaklines out of the cross sections to help create a
Finish Grade and/or Excavation Surface.
Yes, I know about the use of road grids.
I prefer the ability to edit breaklines to accommodate intersections or
cul-de-sacs.
HTH
--
Don Reichle
"King Of Work-Arounds"
LDT3 - SP1/CD3 - SP1
On WIN2K SP4
Dell 1.6 Ghz P4
512MB RAM
NVIDIA 32MB AGP
"Jim" wrote in message news:42164034$1_2@newsprd01...
> I'm not using civil 3d...I'm using LDD/Civil v. 3
>
> Jim
>
>
> "wfb" wrote in message
> news:4216390d$1_3@newsprd01...
> > Jim:
> > You apparently are in the wrong newsgroup. ( . . . civil3d)
> >
> > "Jim" wrote in message
news:42163724$1_2@newsprd01...
> > > That should actually be that my subassemblies do NOT rotate with the
> road
> > > surface through the super.
> > >
> > > Tia
> > > Jim
> > >
> > >
> > > "Jim" wrote in message
news:421636af_3@newsprd01...
> > > > G'day all,
> > > > I've got my cross-sections looking pretty good with different
> > > > subasseblies to represent cut and fill. (my cross-sections have a
2%
> > drop
> > > > over 16-19 feet away from centreline) The problem I'm having now is
> > when
> > > my
> > > > section rotates into a superelevation, the subassemblies
representing
> > the
> > > > shoulders or eop do now rotate with the road surface. Any help on
> this
> > > > matter will be greatly appreciated as all imput is.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > --
> > > > Jim
> > > > LDD 3 w/ Civil 3 (AutoCAD 2002)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
![Autodesk Design & Make Report](https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1350519iCB55845EBFC43016/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999" "Autodesk Design & Make Report")