Showing the actual pipe width on sites can help address clearance issues
from other utilities, etc. As for creating a lisp, I'm not very versed in
that language. :(
"tcebob" wrote in message
news:42161df1$1_1@newsprd01...
> Apologies for questioning the question but, except for very large pipes,
> is it
> productive to show the pipe width? I see it done both ways and for average
> sewer
> pipe (8" to 18") the extra linework just adds clutter to the drawing --
> and has
> a chance of bridging between the lines unless one is watchful of the
> lineweights.
>
> If it has do be done, try this: Make a pline along the route. Whip up a
> little
> lisp to offset to both sides and move the original to a different layer.
> Make a
> manhole block with a wipeout (for existing mhs) and put it where it needs
> to be.
> Advantage: Easily make Pipes alignments because the line is continuous. I
> don't
> think you can use mlines to create alignments, but haven't tried.
>
> rs
>
> "Dennis Hyman" wrote in message
> news:42149f32_1@newsprd01...
> : Does anyone have a customized multiline command that allows you to
> change
> : the offset distance without having to exit the command? This would be a
> : very handy tool to have, especially when drawing existing sewers.
> :
> :
>
>