John, go ahead and send me the database. I will look further. My email is
pat.murnen@autodesk.com
Pat Murnen (Autodesk)
"jschauer" wrote in message
news:21940472.1099675688708.JavaMail.jive@jiveforum2.autodesk.com...
> Pat, What doesn't make sense is that the data fields in question report
> when I use ACE2004 using the same default_cat.mdb as when I try it under
> ACE2005.
>
> As I recall, we simply migrated the default_cat.mdb file records using the
> routine supplied, from the 2004 install to the 2005.
>
> The only difference that I've noted from the 2004 ver. of the database
> tables/fields in question is that the (3) fields are labeled GAUGE,
> MISCELLANEOUS1 and MISCELLANEOUS2 in the 2005 ver. vs. GAUGE, CONDUCTOR(S)
> and INSULATION in the earlier 2004 ver.
>
> When I run the test cable report, both ACE2004 and 2005 access this same
> default_cat.mdb, but only 2004 will report the fields in question.
>
> Note: I've also tried renaming these fields to their 2004 ver. field names
> but they would still not report.
>
> I've attached a new sample test drawing showing cable reports derived
> under both ACE2005 and 2004. I cannot attach the default_cat.mdb file
> since it is 3+ Mb and exceeds the 1 Mb attachment limit. Perhaps you can
> post an email address that I can send it to?
>
> Thank you for your continued assistance in this matter.
> John