Parcel Sizing Methods

[nzeeben]

I like the parcel sizing methods. However in this area and in many others from my understanding when laying out parcels we are concerned with the frontage at the building setback not the parcel boundary. I think it would be within reason to allow the parcel commands to have a setback value where the minimum frontage value is measured.

[Anonymous]

Absolutely...
--

sm

Scott McEachron
DC CADD, Dallas - Fort Worth
http://c3dpavingtheway.blogspot.com/


wrote in message news:5186571@discussion.autodesk.com...
I like the parcel sizing methods. However in this area and in many others
from my understanding when laying out parcels we are concerned with the
frontage at the building setback not the parcel boundary. I think it would
be within reason to allow the parcel commands to have a setback value where
the minimum frontage value is measured.

[Anonymous]

sure thing! right now I make a dummy parcel frontage at the BRL, and layout
around the curve, then delete the dummy and do freeform to match the results
from the first run. sigh.

--
Dana Breig Probert
http://civil3drocks.blogspot.com/
CADapult Ltd
Empowering Design With Innovative Solutions
www.cadapult.net
----------------------------------------------
"Scott McEachron" wrote in message
news:5187257@discussion.autodesk.com...
Absolutely...
--

sm

Scott McEachron
DC CADD, Dallas - Fort Worth
http://c3dpavingtheway.blogspot.com/


wrote in message news:5186571@discussion.autodesk.com...
I like the parcel sizing methods. However in this area and in many others
from my understanding when laying out parcels we are concerned with the
frontage at the building setback not the parcel boundary. I think it would
be within reason to allow the parcel commands to have a setback value where
the minimum frontage value is measured.

[nzeeben]

Is that really less work than just doing them manually?

Nicl
"Dana Breig Probert" wrote in message
news:5202299@discussion.autodesk.com...
sure thing! right now I make a dummy parcel frontage at the BRL, and layout
around the curve, then delete the dummy and do freeform to match the results
from the first run. sigh.

--
Dana Breig Probert
http://civil3drocks.blogspot.com/
CADapult Ltd
Empowering Design With Innovative Solutions
www.cadapult.net
----------------------------------------------
"Scott McEachron" wrote in message
news:5187257@discussion.autodesk.com...
Absolutely...
--

sm

Scott McEachron
DC CADD, Dallas - Fort Worth
http://c3dpavingtheway.blogspot.com/


wrote in message news:5186571@discussion.autodesk.com...
I like the parcel sizing methods. However in this area and in many others
from my understanding when laying out parcels we are concerned with the
frontage at the building setback not the parcel boundary. I think it would
be within reason to allow the parcel commands to have a setback value where
the minimum frontage value is measured.

[Anonymous]

yeah- the temp. parcels take about a min to run, and then i know i have the
50' lot width to the inch. the bubble hasn't burst around here, and if i get
just one more lot in...... ah, the greed.

--
Dana Breig Probert
http://civil3drocks.blogspot.com/
CADapult Ltd
Empowering Design With Innovative Solutions
www.cadapult.net
----------------------------------------------
wrote in message news:5202387@discussion.autodesk.com...
Is that really less work than just doing them manually?

Nicl
.