Community
Civil 3D Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Civil 3D Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular AutoCAD Civil 3D topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Interactive mode

3 REPLIES 3
Reply
Message 1 of 4
Joe-Bouza
346 Views, 3 Replies

Interactive mode

During interactive mode I would work my way upstream check/ making adjustments to pipe sizes; I set my min pipe to 18" for trunk but our local agency allows 15" at catch basin to trunk. So when I make that adjustment I also tried to lower the down stream inverts of the catch basin line to the trunk to increase velocity and the velocity actually goes down when I lower the invert? This seems wrong to me and I'm sure its user error. Do I have to lower all the down stream inverts? I thought the program would do that if I had to adjust the upstream.

 

And more importantly: If I set my codes to min velocity 2.5 fps and min slope 0.2% why did the design analysis run and give me those upstream pipes at min slope and violate min velocity? I must be missing a step.

Your Name
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

3 REPLIES 3
Message 2 of 4
Joe-Bouza
in reply to: Joe-Bouza

hmm? Beuler? <G>

Your Name
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 3 of 4
Matt.Anderson
in reply to: Joe-Bouza

Joe -

 

That's a bunch of questions.  Velocity will go down if you are up against the HGL of the downstream connecting pipe, esp if you are asking if you need to lower the downstream pipes.   Yes, the up/down edit is only dealing with the pipe section that you are currently editing.

 

I would move downstream making corrections and edits to get the system to work.  

 

Matt Anderson

Matthew Anderson, PE CFM
Product Manager
Autodesk (Innovyze)
Message 4 of 4
Joe-Bouza
in reply to: Joe-Bouza

Thanks Matt. Yeah I guess that was a mouthful. I also afterwards recognized my conceptual layout could elliminate a catch basin here and there; the trib and Q are so small the next down streeam basin should be able to handle it.

Your Name
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Rail Community


 

Autodesk Design & Make Report