Thans for commenting Peter.
I am still amazed C3D does not have the ability to label a spot elevation from a Corridor.
I dont want the surface elev from a surface build, I need the actual calculated elev.
I know I harp on that constantly, sorry for the beating
🙂
For those that don't have the ability to do this now, how do you live?
Half the reason we set up alignments and vert align is to get TC elevs, or manhole rim elevs, or any elev from a street
or pipeline.
I know people can make surfaces, but they are not accurate enough for final design (correct to the hundredth) and are
rediculous when talking about pipelines.
The answer is to write a routine like Peter said.
But then I am back to treating C3D just like LDT. My callouts are not dynamic and do not change according to style
changes.
So that comment about "C3D 2007 being the completion of the C3D model" is far from true.
We need a plan callout tool that works with Corridoors.
C'mon, the Mapcad guys made a living off the version of this tool they did.
It used to be part of the Madcapp tools in Softdesk, then they tried to sell it for $1000 a seat when it became LDT.
They had a good tool but it was too expensive and too fancy IMO.
So Autodesk is keenly aware of the need for this and has ignored it in core C3D.
What more can I say about the incompleteness of C3D. It has a long way to go. Its interface is too raw and third
parties have not caught up yet to the automation needed. Thats ok though, things take time to get right.
I just hate it when someone who does not use LDT or another prog to do real street and pipeline design, comes along and
professes C3D is so complete. There are huge gaps in annotation tools and all kinds of stuff we still have to clean up
after it throws down annotation. I would say we are just beginning to see what can be done with a 3D model approach in
civil engineering.
Peter Funk - Autodesk, Inc
|>The expressions haven't gotten to that point that you can use elements from
|>both an HA and a VA together in a single expression. However, you can now
|>label the HA with basic informtion from the VA.
|>
|>The better solution to this problem would be to run a quick corridor down
|>the alignment that has a couple of links on it at -2%. You could then pick
|>up the information from either the links or from a corridor surface made
|>from the links.
|>
|>Another alternative would be to write a quck routine that would rip down the
|>alignment and stakeout points at some increment. It could even have a nice
|>little dialog box that would allow you to pick the alignment, profile,
|>offset, slope, and increment, and even what point group to use for the final
|>points.
|>
|>Peter Funk
|>Autodesk, Inc.
James Maeding
Civil Engineer and Programmer
jmaeding - athunsaker - com