My results were the same. Tanya West (support in Manchester) was successful
in achieving a desired number of ranges using user-defined contours.
Apparently, there is no default value for ranges for that analysis type so
what you spec is what you get.
If that method works on the range issue, there is still the problem of the
output. I expected what I consider to be a standard stage-storage table:
increasing volumes per user-specified increment. That's not what I got.
This thread is already a couple of weeks old. I'll re-post it to see if we
can stir up something.
--
Mike Norton
Total CAD Systems - Houston, Texas
wrote in message news:5446159@discussion.autodesk.com...
I gave James' method a go and I am confused by the results in MY table. I
copied a 2D surface, gave it a contour interval I liked, exploded the copy
and found that the results in my table were nothing like what the exploded
contours gave me. For starters although I could go in an manually change the
breaks in the intervals, I couldn't control how many intervals. I would say
10, and it would give 5. So would say 20, and it would give 7. But even
with the intervals the program chose, the values were a magnitude of 10
times greater than what a third party software gave me.
Oh well, no time to trouble shoot. I'll wait for 2008.