So, I've been pulling my hair out trying to come up with a good solution to this...
We keep iterations of a project in separate folders, such as iteration 1 (30%), iteration 2 (75%), etc. and keep xrefs (e-site, p-site, etc) in a folder in each iteration. (These drawings also contain the surfaces, alignments, etc. shared via data shortcuts.) Using relative paths with our x-refs, no matter what iteration we open up, we are always looking at the xrefs associated with that iteration.
However, with data shortcuts, it seems there is no way to have relative paths. So when I copy my iteration 1 folder to make iteration 2, all the data shortcuts are still pointing at the files in the "iteration 1/xrefs" folder. I've tried using the Data Shortcuts Editor to edit the paths, but it just freezes up every time I try to change anything. The best I've come up with is renaming the xref folder in iteration 1, thereby prompting me choose the proper files under iteration 2 when I go to syncronize references.
The other option would be to have the xref folder on the same level as the iteration folders, and then when I new iteration is made, copy the current xref folder back into the old iteration, thereby preserving those files for the future. But then, if I go to open an old drawing, I have to juggle folders around.
So, I guess what I'm asking is, how does everyone else handle data shortcuts and xrefs in Civil 3D? Is there a better way I could be handling them, or some tips and tricks you can give me to make everything run smoother? We are using Civil 3D 2012, and we do not use Vault.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by mathewkol. Go to Solution.
Can you say that a little louder so the folks in my office can here. I'v been saying till I'm blue in the face.
Your Name
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
Your Name
We essentially do the same thing Matt described. Only difference is we don't use ZIP files. We copy the files to an archive server after every submittal.
We are working on a 220ha land project here so I defiantly feel your pain. Using C3D 2012.
I have ended up dividing our complete site into 3 manageable pieces/sectors. Each with its s own Shortcuts folder. The only common information between the three are a LIDAR file and some existing legal plans. These are pretty much set in stone so I copied them to each of the sectors project folders. This does create some duplication but is necessary to make the large files manageable. ANd, since the will never change risk here is little to none.
For one sector as an example we have we have two iterations/concepts and are working on a third concept. Each with 1000ish lots and 20ish roads set up as a single concept file aka design base file. Each of the concept plans share the same basic xrefs and associated data : contours, existing legal, and existing infrastructure, ex trails and so on. So then, for our common data that needs to be shared we store shortcuts on a working folder for the entire sector so when we make any changes to those common files the result propagates through all iterations. Much like having a separate LDD project for each sector. Each concept contains all the roads, corridors, surfaces, modeling etc. When we move past the concept stage for the sector, data shortcuts will be created. As we move through and divide the sector into smaller stages of 150 or so lots we can then draw on the adopted concept plan and use it as a master file where all the basic design info lives.
One thing I find important with a project this size is to be logical and methodical about naming conventions. Don't let C3D just cryptically number things. Use the old Who, What, When, Where, Why and How rules we all learned in grade six. I definitely makes life better when sorting through mountains of data. It also helps others to work on your projects that dot have the luxury of understanding an ambiguous numbering assignment.
Hope some of my rambling from left field helps.
Thanks for the tips. Using a "current" folder did occur to me a while back, I don't know why I didn't think of it again as I was writing my message. That sounds like a good solution. If anyone else has tips or examples of what they found works well, I would still love to see them too.