It seems that the object was created by the Geotechnical modules. It cannot be exported to AutoCAD. I tried to use the command "Export or Explode", all object will be disappeared e.g. borehole onto the profile, geologies contour line onto the profile… after clicked the commands.
Anyone knows how to do or any trick can help? Thanks.
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
And it is not possible to project the borehole id onto the profile view directly! I finding the another ways!
Yes - this is a fundamental requirement...!!!!
Not sure if it can be done via Projected Objects in the normal way
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
It needs the tool (e.g. KeyAGS) to convert the AGS to meaningful spreadsheet and create a point group and finally project to profile view in Civil 3D!
You can CTRL+A, then CTRL+C in Borehole Manager and then CTRL+V into Excel to get the data into a format that can be manipulated into a usable point file format and used in Civil 3D.
You could even set up a point file format in Civil, based on the Borehole manager output, to read a csv directly without rearrranging the columns etc in Excel.
The CTRL+ to Excel trick works for the Strata manager as well
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
Hi all,
am am quite new so please bear with me.
can a profile look better then what i have got attached. is it possible to bake the different layers more visible and distinct?
Thanks
Whoaaaa.....!!!!! How did you create that profile?
If you have only used the surfaces generated by the geotechnical module you have just found the fundamental flaw in its operation in that it just uses the absolute level of the strata at each hole which more often than not is incorrect and in hilly terrain creates unusable surfaces.
Not an easy way around it unfortunately - if you confirm that this is what you have done I'll explain a method you can use to overcome it (which really should be built into the module)
PS Welcome to the forums, don't be afraid to ask questions; everyone was new to Civil 3d at some point...:)
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
thanks,
thats exactly what i did.
the module creates surfaces and only uses the top and bottum surfaces for stratification, hence the profille shown.
another thing is when i print/plot in plan view i dont get my strip views
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
don't think i understand that, but persoaly i do understand the strata but in terms of presentation is it not possible to get a better profile than what i made. more like hatched layers (in profile vew)
It is possible to hatch between profiles but you need to get the geological surfaces to make sense first.
Look at some of your strata surfaces - I'm guessing you will find the stratigraphical sequence is incorrect i.e.assume stratum 2 should always be below stratum 1 then you could find that in some instances stratum 2 is above stratum 1 (based purely on the surfaces generated generated via the geotech module; it is possible but more likely not). The attached screenshot (from another modelling package explains what is happening in the geotech module
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
@Anonymous wrote:
I AGREE AND I THINK ITS ALSO A PROBLEM THAT CIVIL 3D TAKES THE STRATA LINEARLY
Indeed as this can give rise to totally spurious surfaces and quantities although there is a lengthy (fairly manual) workaround
neilyj (No connection with Autodesk other than using the products in the real world)
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.