Drew,
Much thanks - seems simple to check from your reply, I'll verify and write
to you directly if I have any questions.
Mike
"Drew Burgasser" wrote in message
news:1A753848635E9D667D2BD9052DB61D51@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Michael:
>
> The configuration doesn't really matter. I got inaccurate elevations for
the
> following 3 configurations:
> crest, 75', 100', 1.76%, -1.55%
> sag, 150', 125', -1.55%, 0.61%
> crest, 200', 100', 0.61%, -0.84%
>
> I compared the ElevationAt values with the low point and high point
> elevations listed in Profiles => Edit Profile... => Select PVI. They
don't
> match. So either one or both is/are wrong. My guess is that the listed
> elevation under Select PVI is correct. The HighPointElevation and
> LowPointElevation property for the asym vc also seems to list the correct
> value.
>
> Unrelated, the begin and end station properties for the asym vc are also
> listing incorrectly.
>
> I can send you a drawing and code if you like.
>
> Sincerely,
> Drew Burgasser
> CAD Masters, Inc.
>
>
> "Michael Rogerson" wrote in
message
> news:1F3F1CE494515B1515EB152A024AB7A8@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > Drew,
> >
> > Hoping for more detail... what is the configuration of the curve (sag,
> > crest, grade in/out and lengths 1 & 2) ? Also, what
formulas/calculations
> > are you using to verify the elevations?
> >
> > thanks in advance,
> > Mike
> >
> > "Drew Burgasser" wrote in message
> > news:EA46FEAF4B4612A439C9212170401D05@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > The ElevationAt method for aeccprofiles seems to be giving incorrect
> > > elevations along an aysmmetric vertical curve.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Drew Burgasser
> > > CAD Masters, Inc,
> > > www.cadmasters.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>