Civil 2007 Exam?

[Anonymous]

I saw this lumped in the AU Classes. Anyone know what it is? Civil 3D
certification exam?

Shawn

[nzeeben]

Autodesk's e-store should have a study guide available. You can become a
certified civil 3d user.
Nick
"Shawn" wrote in message
news:5260862@discussion.autodesk.com...
I saw this lumped in the AU Classes. Anyone know what it is? Civil 3D
certification exam?

Shawn

[Anonymous]

Study guide? I think that most of us using the software now are most likely certifiable!

[nzeeben]

I was waiting for someone to crack that joke. It was inevitable. From what
I know of the program autodesk should have certification exams for most
products in the next while. ADT and Inventor have had theirs for a year or
two now.
Nick
wrote in message news:5260907@discussion.autodesk.com...
Study guide? I think that most of us using the software now are most likely
certifiable!

[Anonymous]

I'd like to know who is going to grade them?

John P.

[Anonymous]

I think it should be performance-based.
Start by creating a subdivision with a couple of alignments, profiles, a few parcels and some pipes. Then revise the rights-of-way and two or three of the parcels and create a new pipe network which is a combination of all of the previous networks because the logically separate networks didn't work. Raise the whole site by two feet. If you still have a drawing that isn't corrupt - you win. You get to judge the certifiability of all of the rest of us.
Maybe the efficiency of obtaining an e-mail subscription support resolution could be the tie-breaker.

[Anonymous]

Oh my god you have know idea how much i am LMAO over this.

I just deleted a pipe network because it had a pipe that was "there" but not
"there" and i needed a fresh start at the rules.

You get extra points if your road profile, corridor surface and actual
desired grade at intersection CL actually match.

--
Dana Breig Probert
http://civil3drocks.blogspot.com/
CADapult Ltd
Empowering Design With Innovative Solutions
www.cadapult.net
----------------------------------------------
wrote in message news:5260992@discussion.autodesk.com...
I think it should be performance-based.
Start by creating a subdivision with a couple of alignments, profiles, a few
parcels and some pipes. Then revise the rights-of-way and two or three of
the parcels and create a new pipe network which is a combination of all of
the previous networks because the logically separate networks didn't work.
Raise the whole site by two feet. If you still have a drawing that isn't
corrupt - you win. You get to judge the certifiability of all of the rest of
us.
Maybe the efficiency of obtaining an e-mail subscription support resolution
could be the tie-breaker.

[Anonymous]

Acutually the person with the fewest crashes becomes the AU valedictorian!


Rick
wrote in message news:5260992@discussion.autodesk.com...
I think it should be performance-based.
Start by creating a subdivision with a couple of alignments, profiles, a few
parcels and some pipes. Then revise the rights-of-way and two or three of
the parcels and create a new pipe network which is a combination of all of
the previous networks because the logically separate networks didn't work.
Raise the whole site by two feet. If you still have a drawing that isn't
corrupt - you win. You get to judge the certifiability of all of the rest of
us.
Maybe the efficiency of obtaining an e-mail subscription support resolution
could be the tie-breaker.

[Anonymous]

Is that a Certifed c3d user????

Or a a Certifiable c3d user?????

Either way its just crazy

[Anonymous]

We'll leave the semantics up to the testers. Far be it from the testees to decide that.