I have consistently now seen something that seems to be a very good indicator of whether or not someone will be able to adopt Civil 3D.
With Civil 3D, a critical element is template maintenance. Whenever someone is working on a drawing, and discovers a need for a new style, it is critical that the new style get incorporated into the template. And it appears that the style must be incorporated into the template RIGHT THEN, soon after it's created, or it gets forgotten and never makes it into the template. Similarly, if someone notices a problem with the settings in the template, then the problem must be fixed in the template. If the user simply fixes the problem in the drawing, then the problem stays in the template, and the user must constantly perform the same fix in new drawings.
I have noticed that some people have a hard time making changes to their drawing template. They almost always say "I don't have time." But quite to the contrary, you do not have time to ignore your template. Getting your template into a good state is critical to being able to work quickly with Civil 3D.
So it seems to me now that there is one indicator, above all others, that gives you a good idea on how successful a given person will be with using Civil 3D. If that person says "I don't have time to worry about my template", then that person will probably be one of those who gets fed up with Civil 3D, and will have a very difficult (or impossible) time trying to adopt Civil 3D.
At least, this is the case with smaller companies, especially the one-man shops. With larger companies, it gets a bit more convoluted, because it may not be a good idea to have everyone making changes to the template. So an official system of getting new styles and fixed styles into the template becomes mandatory. And then this system MUST BE USED. If not, chances of the company as a whole making efficient use of Civil 3D go down dramatically.
-- Sinc
http://www.ejsurveying.com
http://www.quuxsoft.com
Sinc