2015 - New Corridor Point Labels

[Cadguru42]

Has anyone successfully used the new option to create corridor point labels? I followed the steps in the help file (http://help.autodesk.com/cloudhelp/2015/ENU/Civil3D-UserGuide/files/GUID-08839F9F-F96B-47E3-84DE-4A7...), but that didn't seem to work. Everything seems fine until the last step. When I use the command CorridorSectionLabelsConvert on my existing section views and switch to the corridor point style labels, all my labels disappear. If I switch back to the code set style labels they come back, but the new corridor point labels don't show anything. 

Here's what they look like with the "old" method using the code set styles.

When I turn on the corridor point style labels, this is what I get.

Also, none of the staggering seems to be working. It's set as you can see below.

I'm at a loss on what's going on. Am I missing something or is this another Autodesk fail?

[LeafRiders]

I assume that if you go to edit the style and check the layer settings that the layers are turned on. Along with the assigned layer itself being on and unfrozen for the components that aren't showing up?

[Cadguru42]

---

@LeafRiders wrote:

I assume that if you go to edit the style and check the layer settings that the layers are turned on. Along with the assigned layer itself being on and unfrozen for the components that aren't showing up?

---

Yes, the layers for the corridor point labels are on the same layers as the code set label styles.

Here's some even more confusing issues I've had with this. I reset the defaults to go back to the "old" code set label styles and also updated the existing cross section views to the "old" method. Everything looks fine. The weird part is that I created a new sample line group and when I created the section views for those, the corridor point label style was used and worked, even though the defaults are back to using the code set style. I ran the CorridorSectionLabelsConvert command and switched them back to the code set style labels, but it's confusing as to why it worked on a new sample line set, but not an existing one.