Visual LISP, AutoLISP and General Customization
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
*jemery0630
SYSVAR LIST
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
113 Views, 5 Replies
06-12-2003 01:13 AM
The list in the help file does not seem to be 100% complete. Is the list in
the Express tools under System Variable Editor a complete list of all the
sysvar's? If not, anyone no where to get a complete list?
the Express tools under System Variable Editor a complete list of all the
sysvar's? If not, anyone no where to get a complete list?
*Ambrosius, Lee
Re: SYSVAR LIST
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-12-2003 01:32 AM in reply to:
*jemery0630
No the list is only up to and including AutoCAD 2000 that comes with ET.
The link below will get you a complete document from R12 - 2004.
Robust Version
http://www.hyperpics.com/images/AutoCAD%20System%2 0Variables.pdf
Quick Guide
http://www.hyperpics.com/images/AutoCAD%20System%2 0Variable%20Quick%20Guide.
pdf
Thanks,
Lee Ambrosius
HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
"jemery0630" wrote in message
news:814E422423480AB2B7D22EA808F35A2C@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> The list in the help file does not seem to be 100% complete. Is the list
in
> the Express tools under System Variable Editor a complete list of all the
> sysvar's? If not, anyone no where to get a complete list?
>
>
The link below will get you a complete document from R12 - 2004.
Robust Version
http://www.hyperpics.com/images/AutoCAD%20System%2
Quick Guide
http://www.hyperpics.com/images/AutoCAD%20System%2
Thanks,
Lee Ambrosius
HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
"jemery0630"
news:814E422423480AB2B7D22EA808F35A2C@in.WebX.maYI
> The list in the help file does not seem to be 100% complete. Is the list
in
> the Express tools under System Variable Editor a complete list of all the
> sysvar's? If not, anyone no where to get a complete list?
>
>
*jemery0630
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-12-2003 01:40 AM in reply to:
*jemery0630
Thanks
"Lee Ambrosius" wrote in message
news:3AA2403CBE2CEF2D521AFDEE8F9F6D5A@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> No the list is only up to and including AutoCAD 2000 that comes with ET.
> The link below will get you a complete document from R12 - 2004.
>
> Robust Version
> http://www.hyperpics.com/images/AutoCAD%20System%2 0Variables.pdf
>
> Quick Guide
>
http://www.hyperpics.com/images/AutoCAD%20System%2 0Variable%20Quick%20Guide.
> pdf
>
> Thanks,
> Lee Ambrosius
> HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
>
>
> "jemery0630" wrote in message
> news:814E422423480AB2B7D22EA808F35A2C@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> > The list in the help file does not seem to be 100% complete. Is the list
> in
> > the Express tools under System Variable Editor a complete list of all
the
> > sysvar's? If not, anyone no where to get a complete list?
> >
> >
>
>
"Lee Ambrosius"
news:3AA2403CBE2CEF2D521AFDEE8F9F6D5A@in.WebX.maYI
> No the list is only up to and including AutoCAD 2000 that comes with ET.
> The link below will get you a complete document from R12 - 2004.
>
> Robust Version
> http://www.hyperpics.com/images/AutoCAD%20System%2
>
> Quick Guide
>
http://www.hyperpics.com/images/AutoCAD%20System%2
>
> Thanks,
> Lee Ambrosius
> HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
>
>
> "jemery0630"
> news:814E422423480AB2B7D22EA808F35A2C@in.WebX.maYI
> > The list in the help file does not seem to be 100% complete. Is the list
> in
> > the Express tools under System Variable Editor a complete list of all
the
> > sysvar's? If not, anyone no where to get a complete list?
> >
> >
>
>
*Ambrosius, Lee
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-12-2003 02:07 AM in reply to:
*jemery0630
Not a problem... let me know if you see something missing or that could be
elaborated on a little bit more.
Thanks,
Lee Ambrosius
HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
elaborated on a little bit more.
Thanks,
Lee Ambrosius
HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
*Alessi, Marc'Antonio
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-12-2003 03:50 PM in reply to:
*jemery0630
About CPUTICKS and MILLISECS, what is more accurate?
__________________________________________________ _____
CPUTICKS (Undocumeted) (Read-only) R2000i:
Number of CPU clock ticks and *** is more accurate ***
in time keeping than MILLISEC
__________________________________________________ _____
__________________________________________________ _____
MILLISECS (Undocumeted) (Read-only) R2000i:
*** More accurate *** time information than the time
value held in CPUTICKS
__________________________________________________ _____
"Lee Ambrosius" ha scritto nel messaggio
news:108042F72D1588B01D84CD73754F3905@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> Not a problem... let me know if you see something missing or that could be
> elaborated on a little bit more.
>
> Thanks,
> Lee Ambrosius
> HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
>
>
__________________________________________________
CPUTICKS (Undocumeted) (Read-only) R2000i:
Number of CPU clock ticks and *** is more accurate ***
in time keeping than MILLISEC
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
MILLISECS (Undocumeted) (Read-only) R2000i:
*** More accurate *** time information than the time
value held in CPUTICKS
__________________________________________________
"Lee Ambrosius"
news:108042F72D1588B01D84CD73754F3905@in.WebX.maYI
> Not a problem... let me know if you see something missing or that could be
> elaborated on a little bit more.
>
> Thanks,
> Lee Ambrosius
> HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
>
>
*Ambrosius, Lee
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-12-2003 09:28 PM in reply to:
*jemery0630
Thanks... this is what I have that has not been added yet for these two....
CPUTICKS is from the Pentium counter register. It's a very high frequency
timer.
MILLISECS is from the Win32 GetTickCount API. It's the number of millisecs
since the system was booted.
Thanks,
Lee Ambrosius
HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
"Marc'Antonio Alessi" wrote in message
news:66A4E5BE6C67614DA97DF6D9DCAA2646@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> About CPUTICKS and MILLISECS, what is more accurate?
>
> __________________________________________________ _____
>
> CPUTICKS (Undocumeted) (Read-only) R2000i:
>
> Number of CPU clock ticks and *** is more accurate ***
> in time keeping than MILLISEC
> __________________________________________________ _____
>
>
> __________________________________________________ _____
>
> MILLISECS (Undocumeted) (Read-only) R2000i:
>
> *** More accurate *** time information than the time
> value held in CPUTICKS
> __________________________________________________ _____
CPUTICKS is from the Pentium counter register. It's a very high frequency
timer.
MILLISECS is from the Win32 GetTickCount API. It's the number of millisecs
since the system was booted.
Thanks,
Lee Ambrosius
HyperPics, http://www.hyperpics.com
"Marc'Antonio Alessi"
news:66A4E5BE6C67614DA97DF6D9DCAA2646@in.WebX.maYI
> About CPUTICKS and MILLISECS, what is more accurate?
>
> __________________________________________________
>
> CPUTICKS (Undocumeted) (Read-only) R2000i:
>
> Number of CPU clock ticks and *** is more accurate ***
> in time keeping than MILLISEC
> __________________________________________________
>
>
> __________________________________________________
>
> MILLISECS (Undocumeted) (Read-only) R2000i:
>
> *** More accurate *** time information than the time
> value held in CPUTICKS
> __________________________________________________

