Please tell me I'm not crazy here.
Do you get an Access Violation in 2013 with this?
(setq i 1) (repeat 255 (setq MYLIST (append MYLIST (list (cons i i)))) (setq i (1+ i))) ; now, are you ready? !MYLIST ; or even: (print MYLIST) ; fun, right?
@honkinberry wrote:Please tell me I'm not crazy here.
Do you get an Access Violation in 2013 with this?
(setq i 1) (repeat 255 (setq MYLIST (append MYLIST (list (cons i i)))) (setq i (1+ i))) ; now, are you ready? !MYLIST ; or even: (print MYLIST) ; fun, right?
I get one even back in good-ol' 2004. Using !MYLIST at least returns the list looking as you would expect before reporting the access violation. But (print MYLIST) has the list somewhat jumbled, starting and ending with items rather than with list-opening and list-closing parentheses [which appear in a few places inside], and too long [with a duplicated stretch].
Thanks, Kent.
So you still hold on to a copy of 2004?! I can't imagine how quickly that must load.
Well I just heard back from ADN -- they just gave me a ridiculous workaround, and didn't even flag it for the product development team.
I'm getting a psychic prediction.... coming in from the fog.....
Dassault is going to crush Autodesk.
--J
I get errors when running that from the command line, but not when running in the VLIDE console window (on AcadM 2012).
So this is a problem in the command interpreter, not in the underlying Lisp implementation.
--
Still weird though, right?
Well, ADN did log a Change Request -- 1491681.
--J
The same problem here with Cad 2013 .
but if I used foreach function to list them , I would get them listed normally .