Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
Hi! I have different results for same study. The objective is to balance the filling between parts. Use 3D Mesh the filling is not balanced; use Dual Domain the filling is balanced. The parts have different thickness. In my opinion use 3D Mesh is more correct, but is true?
You are right the 3D mesh is often better for the filling results especially if you try to simulate special shapes with no good match mesh (pipes in your case). However it's not true for the filling pressure. I notified lot of differences between DD and 3D especially for the PC polymers so be careful.
You are trying to balance the cavities with different size of gate. It's good for the filling but not good for the packing because the pressure drop is different for both and so for the packing efficiency to.
![Autodesk Design & Make Report](https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1350519iCB55845EBFC43016/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999" "Autodesk Design & Make Report")