Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I have a model that was run using TPU CF40-01. The part has a wall thickness that tapers from 5mm to 1mm. Dual DomainConfidence of fill, the flow front freezes before filling, which is expected. The 3D states that it will fill but may have an unacceptable part. Why is there a variation in the results between Dual Domain and 3D? Which of the two is the more accurate to reality? If 3D is more accurate representation of fill then how can we get the fiber orientation in the flowage area to match in Dual Domain?
![Autodesk Design & Make Report](https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1350519iCB55845EBFC43016/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999" "Autodesk Design & Make Report")