Discussion Groups

Simulation Mechanical and Multiphysics

Reply
Member
Posts: 4
Registered: ‎09-12-2012
Accepted Solution

Cantilever beam constraints

501 Views, 4 Replies
09-12-2012 02:31 AM

I know that fixed end of Cantilever beam is fully constrained, but I see in an Autodesk tutorial, only middle row nodes at the fixed end are fully constrained and the remaining nodes at fixed end are constrained only for translation in X direction. Can any one please help me with this?


Thanks

Please use plain text.
Employee
Posts: 398
Registered: ‎05-06-2010

Re: Cantilever beam constraints

09-12-2012 06:27 AM in reply to: tharun160190

I assume you use solid brick elements here, instead of beam elements.

The constraints setting in the manual is actually all right.

 

Constraints on the middle row means to fix translation along X, Y, Z and rotation along X at the end.

The additional X constraints on other nodes at the end mean fixing rotations along Y and Z.

So finally, all 6 rigid body DOFs get fixed at the end.

Usually, this is good enough for simulating a cantilever beam, though there must be some difference between this setting and full constraints.

 

You can decide if this difference matters to you model or not.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".
Please use plain text.
Valued Mentor
Posts: 459
Registered: ‎08-30-2012

Re: Cantilever beam constraints

09-12-2012 06:49 AM in reply to: tharun160190

Hi tharun160190,

 

Can you be more specific? Which tutorial are you referring to? What direction is X compared to the length of the beam?

 

My guess is that they want to compare the stress at the fixed end with the "theoretical" value of M*c/I = F*L*(h/2)/I for a force at the end of the beam. This formula does not take Poisson's ratio effect into account. If the model is made of brick (or 2D) elements, and if all of the nodes at the wall are fully fixed, you will get a much different stress.

 

John Holtz, PE
Mechanical Engineer
Pittsburgh, PA

16 years experience with Simulation Mechanical
Please use plain text.
Member
Posts: 4
Registered: ‎09-12-2012

Re: Cantilever beam constraints

09-12-2012 07:45 PM in reply to: S.LI

I t makes sense. I will try doing in both the ways.

 

Thank you very much for the help.

Please use plain text.
Member
Posts: 4
Registered: ‎09-12-2012

Re: Cantilever beam constraints

09-12-2012 07:49 PM in reply to: AstroJohnPE

Hi John Holtz

    I was reffering to Finite Element Analysis in Practice Instructor Manual. Length of the beam is in X direction and I think the first reply to my post answers my question. Thank you very much for trying to help me :smileyhappy:

Please use plain text.