Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

problem de convergence - analyse de semelle

3 REPLIES 3
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 4
antoine.carimalo
633 Views, 3 Replies

problem de convergence - analyse de semelle

 

Hi,

 

I am trying to run a "Analyse Non Lineaire" on a model that include seismic loading. (see attached)

 

I have some problems :

- I have around 10 on 47 seimic combination that have NO "convergence"

- I don't no if there is a report where the calculation errors are written on to debug

- the seismic cases without vertical dead load is "converging". No sense.

- the ground reaction presure is not true on combination that includes seismic loads (I found manually unfavorable presure)

 

 

Thanks for helping

 

 

Cdy

 

 

3 REPLIES 3
Message 2 of 4

Sorry it's fine now,

 

I had a problem on my Newmark combinations.

 

Somebody now why when modal sismic analysis is running on a non linear model the combination are linear for all of those that includes sismic case.

 

Combination without modal sismic cases inside are non-linear combinations.

 

Other problem : the seismic cases : Robot doesn't take into acount the uplift free in these loading cases, isn't it?

 

I think Robot is wrong. It is very dangerous.

 

I can I solve the problem? Maybe If I convert manually each load into an horizontal static load for run my model in static non-linear only?

 

I attach the last model for exemple

Message 3 of 4

Please read:

 

http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Robot-Structural/Uplift/m-p/3320823/

 

http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Robot-Structural/Barre-de-treillis-traction-compression-vs-s%...

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
Message 4 of 4

Hi,

 

 

It is exactly what I need to confirm my doubts.

 

Thanks a lot

 

I also understand now problem métallic frame analysis I had in the past.

 

 

It is quite dangerous ! calculation is runing well without any warnings.

 

 

I am usual to make a separate model to design my rafts. It is fine.

 

 

Thanks

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report