Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Time history analysis on a 2D frame problems

6 REPLIES 6
Reply
Message 1 of 7
Anonymous
528 Views, 6 Replies

Time history analysis on a 2D frame problems

Hi I´m trying to do a time history analysis on a 2D frame. I´ve created the a random excitation in MatLab using the rand() function and saved it on a thf. file with time on the first column and force on the second (see attachment).

When i try to open it on robot it crashes and i have to close the program. What did i do wrong?

 

The second problem I’m having is with the frame that I’m studying (attachment figure 1). For some reason when running a modal analysis I’m not getting the natural frequencies that I should be getting. Any idea why?

Thanks a lot. 

6 REPLIES 6
Message 2 of 7
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: Anonymous

Replace commas by dots in thf file

Last value should be set at 600 



Rafal Gaweda
Message 3 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi and can you please check the model I´ve made 🙂 the frequencies should be 2.7 Hz for the first mode and 7.0Hz for the second. But robot is giving me different numbers.

 

Thanks a lot

 

Edit. i forgot to mention I calculated the natural frequencies with:

 

det(K-w^2*M)=0

 

being:

K- stiffness matrix 

w- natural frequencies

M- mass matrix 

 

 

Message 4 of 7
Pawel.Pulak
in reply to: Anonymous

First two vibration frequencies calculated for your original model by Robot (disregard density active, considering only horizontal masses resulting from conversion of UDL load) are f1= 1.17 Hz and f2= 3.10 Hz.

 

In you last post you have mentioned that you have calculated the frequencies yourself (f1= 2.7 Hz and f2= 7.0 Hz) from:

  det(K-w^2*M)=0

  being:

  K- stiffness matrix 

  w- natural frequencies

  M- mass matrix

 

But is the above formula w is not a natural frequency (in Hz) but pulsation (in radian/s)

Even considering this mistake and converting from pulsation to frequency your results (f1= 0.43 Hz and f2= 7.0 Hz are not coherent with Robot.

But what was the model calculated by you - have you really "manually" calculated the model with 4 dynamic degrees of freedom as the model in Robot?

I have calculated manually the simplified model with 2 dynamic degrees of freedom  (vertical cantilever with 2 masses - in the middle and on the end) and I have received the following frequencies:

f1=1.18 Hz and f2= 3.09

So they are very close to results of Robot.

Please double-check your manual calculations - especially calculation of stiffness and considered masses.

 

Regards,

 


Pawel Pulak
Technical Account Specialist
Message 5 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Pawel.Pulak

Hi thanks for the reply. On the manual calculations I´ve only considered 2 dynamic degrees of freedom, how do I tell robot that only want the horizontal direction of each floor of the frame as degrees of freedom?

 

Edit: and the values 2.7 Hz and 7.0 Hz are already after converting pulsation to frequencies 🙂

 

Plus the beam has infinite stiffness so there are no rotations and deformations of the materials should not be considered. How do i implement that on Robot?

 

Thanks a lot for all the help 🙂

Message 6 of 7
Pawel.Pulak
in reply to: Anonymous

It seems that you have made some mistake in your manual calculations:) Attached are mine for your reference.

 

As concerns the infinite stiffness of beams it can be modeled defining rigid links overlapping these beams. Defining them results in almost no change of the frequency of vibrations - as could be predicted looking at shapes of vibration modes in your original model.

 

Regards,


Pawel Pulak
Technical Account Specialist
Message 7 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

ok thanks a lot for all the help. You were great. I´ll review my manual calculations then 🙂

 

 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report