Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

"loaded Tags" system is *way* too limiting!

1 REPLY 1
Reply
Message 1 of 2
Anonymous
176 Views, 1 Reply

"loaded Tags" system is *way* too limiting!

RVT's system of auto-tagging objects based upon Category is sure
convenient -
when you only need one tag per Category.

But in the case of a Category like "Generic Models",
its just not feasible.

Having to return to "loaded Tags" GUI time, and time again;
to set the Tag for a Category is a royal PITA.
It's just not a viable workflow to do this, IMO;
and really needs some attention.

Why not expand this system to make it a little more versatile?
I see that in 2010 we now may designate OmniClass in our Family Parameters?
Why not specify Tags per OmniClass designations? Or Assembly Code?
Or *something* other than just Category?
Or, alternatively, please give us a *lot* more Categories...
1 REPLY 1
Message 2 of 2
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

"caLayton" wrote in message
news:6310514@discussion.autodesk.com...
> Why not specify Tags per OmniClass designations? Or Assembly Code?
> Or *something* other than just Category?
> Or, alternatively, please give us a *lot* more Categories...

Having control of the Tag per Viewpoint (plan, front, left, right, etc.)
for each Category/OmniClass/Assembly Code/etc.
wouldn't be such a bad idea, either...

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report


Autodesk Design & Make Report