• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • QuickCAD

    Reply
    *Bocaz-Larson, Doug

    Teaching with QuickCAD vs. AutoCAD

    49 Views, 4 Replies
    02-16-2000 10:34 AM
    I would like to teach a CAD class out our technical college. Ideally, I
    would like to teach with AutoCAD but the cost is too high. Would QuickCAD
    be a good alternative? Will the students learn the basic concepts of
    AutoCAD using QuickCAD? If my students learned QuickCAD and got a job
    using AutoCAD, would they be lost or have an advantage?

    How about AutoSketch? Is it more similar to AutoCAD than QuickCAD?

    Doug
    Please use plain text.
    *Norris, Ric

    Re: Teaching with QuickCAD vs. AutoCAD

    02-16-2000 11:50 AM in reply to: *Bocaz-Larson, Doug
    Hi Doug,

    What you are suggesting, is the same as teaching potential 747 pilots how to
    fly in a Cessna.

    There are very few similarities between QuickCAD & AutoCAD....although some
    principles are the same, the way to execute them are entirely different. If
    you want your students to learn AutoCAD, teach them AutoCAD....by teaching
    them QuickCAD and they were actually able to get a job in the AutoCAD
    industry, they would be totally lost and your efforts would have really been
    in vain.

    AutoCAD LT would be the best alternative....it is so close to full blown
    AutoCAD, it is scary....the main differences between the 2 is that LT does
    not have the ability to create full-on 3D graphics and it doesn't support
    LISP...apart from those, it is pretty much identical....plus LT is a
    fraction of the price....there may also be academic pricing structures in
    your area for AutoCAD/AutoCAD LT...which may make the pricing a little more
    realistic.

    AutoSketch & QuickCAD are basically the same software.

    Ric Norris.

    "Doug Bocaz-Larson" wrote in message
    news:88eqdl$l9f7@adesknews2.autodesk.com...
    > I would like to teach a CAD class out our technical college. Ideally, I
    > would like to teach with AutoCAD but the cost is too high. Would QuickCAD
    > be a good alternative? Will the students learn the basic concepts of
    > AutoCAD using QuickCAD? If my students learned QuickCAD and got a job
    > using AutoCAD, would they be lost or have an advantage?
    >
    > How about AutoSketch? Is it more similar to AutoCAD than QuickCAD?
    >
    > Doug
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Smith, Harvey

    Re:

    02-16-2000 12:20 PM in reply to: *Bocaz-Larson, Doug
    Good comparison. On the mark. I would have recommended AS over QC, just because
    of the added features, but your repsonse is right.

    H

    Ric Norris wrote:
    >
    > Hi Doug,
    >
    > What you are suggesting, is the same as teaching potential 747 pilots how to
    > fly in a Cessna.
    >
    > There are very few similarities between QuickCAD & AutoCAD....although some
    > principles are the same, the way to execute them are entirely different. If
    > you want your students to learn AutoCAD, teach them AutoCAD....by teaching
    > them QuickCAD and they were actually able to get a job in the AutoCAD
    > industry, they would be totally lost and your efforts would have really been
    > in vain.
    >
    > AutoCAD LT would be the best alternative....it is so close to full blown
    > AutoCAD, it is scary....the main differences between the 2 is that LT does
    > not have the ability to create full-on 3D graphics and it doesn't support
    > LISP...apart from those, it is pretty much identical....plus LT is a
    > fraction of the price....there may also be academic pricing structures in
    > your area for AutoCAD/AutoCAD LT...which may make the pricing a little more
    > realistic.
    >
    > AutoSketch & QuickCAD are basically the same software.
    >
    > Ric Norris.
    >
    > "Doug Bocaz-Larson" wrote in message
    > news:88eqdl$l9f7@adesknews2.autodesk.com...
    > > I would like to teach a CAD class out our technical college. Ideally, I
    > > would like to teach with AutoCAD but the cost is too high. Would QuickCAD
    > > be a good alternative? Will the students learn the basic concepts of
    > > AutoCAD using QuickCAD? If my students learned QuickCAD and got a job
    > > using AutoCAD, would they be lost or have an advantage?
    > >
    > > How about AutoSketch? Is it more similar to AutoCAD than QuickCAD?
    > >
    > > Doug
    > >
    > >

    --
    Please use plain text.
    *Buck, Chris

    Re:

    02-16-2000 04:35 PM in reply to: *Bocaz-Larson, Doug
    What features are those?

    Chris

    Harvey Smith wrote in message
    news:38AB067A.267A914D@westnet.com...
    > Good comparison. On the mark. I would have recommended AS over QC, just
    because
    > of the added features, but your repsonse is right.
    >
    > H
    >
    > Ric Norris wrote:
    > >
    > > Hi Doug,
    > >
    > > What you are suggesting, is the same as teaching potential 747 pilots
    how to
    > > fly in a Cessna.
    > >
    > > There are very few similarities between QuickCAD & AutoCAD....although
    some
    > > principles are the same, the way to execute them are entirely different.
    If
    > > you want your students to learn AutoCAD, teach them AutoCAD....by
    teaching
    > > them QuickCAD and they were actually able to get a job in the AutoCAD
    > > industry, they would be totally lost and your efforts would have really
    been
    > > in vain.
    > >
    > > AutoCAD LT would be the best alternative....it is so close to full blown
    > > AutoCAD, it is scary....the main differences between the 2 is that LT
    does
    > > not have the ability to create full-on 3D graphics and it doesn't
    support
    > > LISP...apart from those, it is pretty much identical....plus LT is a
    > > fraction of the price....there may also be academic pricing structures
    in
    > > your area for AutoCAD/AutoCAD LT...which may make the pricing a little
    more
    > > realistic.
    > >
    > > AutoSketch & QuickCAD are basically the same software.
    > >
    > > Ric Norris.
    > >
    > > "Doug Bocaz-Larson" wrote in message
    > > news:88eqdl$l9f7@adesknews2.autodesk.com...
    > > > I would like to teach a CAD class out our technical college. Ideally,
    I
    > > > would like to teach with AutoCAD but the cost is too high. Would
    QuickCAD
    > > > be a good alternative? Will the students learn the basic concepts of
    > > > AutoCAD using QuickCAD? If my students learned QuickCAD and got a
    job
    > > > using AutoCAD, would they be lost or have an advantage?
    > > >
    > > > How about AutoSketch? Is it more similar to AutoCAD than QuickCAD?
    > > >
    > > > Doug
    > > >
    > > >
    >
    > --
    Please use plain text.
    *Rafuse, L.

    Re: Teaching with QuickCAD vs. AutoCAD

    02-19-2000 10:20 AM in reply to: *Bocaz-Larson, Doug
    Doug Bocaz-Larson wrote:

    > I would like to teach a CAD class out our technical college. Ideally, I
    > would like to teach with AutoCAD but the cost is too high. Would QuickCAD
    > be a good alternative?

    No.

    > Will the students learn the basic concepts of
    > AutoCAD using QuickCAD?

    No.

    > If my students learned QuickCAD and got a job
    > using AutoCAD, would they be lost or have an advantage?

    Lost.

    >
    >
    > How about AutoSketch? Is it more similar to AutoCAD than QuickCAD?
    >

    Far as I know, same as QuickCad except a few more doodads.

    AutoCAD Lt or one of the AutoCAD alternatives would be better if you want them
    to be familiar with AutoCAD.

    If you want them to be able to produce good 2D drawings, QC or AS are good
    choices.

    --
    Len Rafuse
    Vision Engineering
    Please use plain text.