Message 1 of 4
What is your workflow developing a NET program for civil3d or acad ?
Not applicable
04-25-2009
12:47 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
There is ARXunload but no NETUNLOAD , so debugging means close civil3d ,
reopen it , reload dll using NETLOAD , find a new error and so on .
Since i am not a pro I make numerous mistakes so developing for civil3d
using NET is hell .
Autocad loads quite quickly but civil3d loading is time consuming .
I also think this is bad for hdd health .
Using a solid state disk might be quite faster .
But I think it is also and even worse for ssd health .
- So what is your workflow developing a NET program for civil3d or acad ?
- Is it technically possible for autodesk to create a NET IDE like vba or
should I stop hopping ?
LISP is the absolute best portable solution for future cad versions but I
think it is completely outdated
VBA we were told that it is about to die and that it is the worst solution
for the future - which is 64bit OS
ActiveX is quite easy to develop and debug but SLOW
objectARX ... well I am not a pro , I have no time to learn C++ and I am a
fun of RAD
NET has endless capabilities BUT debugging is hell
And even worse ... civil3d custom subassemblies are created throught
programming . NET programming .
reopen it , reload dll using NETLOAD , find a new error and so on .
Since i am not a pro I make numerous mistakes so developing for civil3d
using NET is hell .
Autocad loads quite quickly but civil3d loading is time consuming .
I also think this is bad for hdd health .
Using a solid state disk might be quite faster .
But I think it is also and even worse for ssd health .
- So what is your workflow developing a NET program for civil3d or acad ?
- Is it technically possible for autodesk to create a NET IDE like vba or
should I stop hopping ?
LISP is the absolute best portable solution for future cad versions but I
think it is completely outdated
VBA we were told that it is about to die and that it is the worst solution
for the future - which is 64bit OS
ActiveX is quite easy to develop and debug but SLOW
objectARX ... well I am not a pro , I have no time to learn C++ and I am a
fun of RAD
NET has endless capabilities BUT debugging is hell
And even worse ... civil3d custom subassemblies are created throught
programming . NET programming .