We just moved from Inventor 2024 to the new version Inventor 2026 and when we opened older parts, we found that there was an annoying change in the display of sketches. I am attaching an image with the display of sketches of one part from Inventor 2023 to 2026 and also this part. The way sketches are displayed in Inventor 2024 is very important to us. Will it be possible to revert this behavior? Show More

I guess I don't even have to explain it anymore, since it has been requested a thousand times already. But after years of requests, can we finally add SW width constraint? It would be the most significant update in years, after many updates with useless functions that don't really add to the user friendliness. Speaking of user friendliness, there is still a lot more that Inventor can learn from Solidworks. Not to criticize inventor, but I have the feeling there are to focused on special features and to little on everyday user friendliness. Show More

when can we finally get an update on the measurement tool. It is extremely limited in functionality. There is no way to measure the max distance (workarounds like creating and projecting edges is not acceptable) , there is not way to measure in a particular vector direction for example in the vector of an edge (workarounds like creating planes and axes are not acceptable ). Please please please learn from catia. their measurement tool is so intuitive and powerful that using inventors feels like using toy scissors after using a light saber. I know the coders are smart enough to implement this, but are the program managers brave enough to green light it? Show More

It might be helpful to create a folder with all the sketches in the parts and weldments tree as the constraints folder Show More

Good morning, I noticed that there is no option to mark on the drawing the hole type by referencing the name of the saved preset. This feature would be useful when dealing with components that have special pre-holes, for example for press-fit bushings on a 3D-printed part. In real situations, the operator looking at the drawing does not directly see the preset name ‘M3 self-tapping bushings,’ but only the depth and diameter. It is therefore necessary to open the hole annotation every time and manually write the type of bushing to be used. Show More

This is perhaps a rather minor thing but occurs frequently enough for me to make an idea to eventually get it changed.   So, when you have a section view active in an assembly and place a new component in it, the newly placed component very often ends up on the non-visible side of the section plane. It forces me to either undo the placement and do it again with more care (turning the model before placing it), or delete the section plane, move the component (by adding constraints), and then turn on the section view again.   The idea would be that inventor checks if the part being placed is about to go end up on the wrong side of the section plane and if so, moves it to the closest point where it's still at least partly visible, i.e. on the active section plane. It would save me from at least some unnecessary hassle.  Show More

With version 2026 the layout of the Open and Save tab has been changed and personally I find it very difficult to use and get used to it because I find it confusing and disorganized as well as being difficult to find what you are looking for: In previous versions, folders and subfolders were displayed on different levels (subfolders were moved further to the right) and sorted based on project settings; only the folders set in the project were visible. These two properties made it easy to search for files. A lot of time was spent only if the files had to be searched for in other locations. With the current screen there is a very long tree, everything is mixed up and even opening saved project files takes time. My proposal is to divide the tree block into two parts: the one above should go back to being like the previous one but with the current graphics, that is, only the saved projects are shown; basically, only the Working Area, Libraries, Frequency Used Subfolder, and Recent Folder trees would be shown (personally I would also give the user the option to define which one he wants to see first and which one after); the one below might show the folders as the standard windows explorer shows them. I'm attaching an image to give you an idea of ​​my thoughts, I don't know if I've been very clear.   Carlo     Show More

❗ Autodesk Inventor "Make Components" Auto Numbering: ❗ I was missing the functionality to automatically create Assembly Filename and the Component Filenames, when using the "Make Components Command" in Autodesk Inventor Software. 💡 I have automated this within a add in, by using a userinterface you are able to predefine the file-naming. 💡 Via a dialog-box with the following inputfields you create the setup: -AssemblyName -PartName Defined by: -Prefix which is filled in per default from the Assembly name, Which ca be modified later. -a delimiter via a dropdown menu -a numbering sequence -a second delimiter via a dropdown menu. -and a suffix The settings will be remembered when selecting another selection for making components. Also the numbering sequence will be remembered as the last number created. Maybe this a good addition for future releases of Autodesk Inventor.   Knoors Inventor Tools Part Make Components Name  Show More

I'm making an assembly of 2 parts with Male/Female connections. I imagine this is not very uncommon and a lot of people will come across this situation too. But making the parts', male/female connections line up in the right orientation is sometimes a bit of work. Why can we not just automatically make the female part based on interferences?   Example: The interference in this case would create a cut in the longer tube.  Show More

Hi there,   currrently Inventor is lacking the abilitiy to export directly into the IFC format including iProperties, especially user defined i-properties. There are multiple possibilities to set check marks inside Inventor, but this should be only relevant for exporting into a Revit file. If a mechanical designer has to deliver IFC-files to their customer, the only help today is to 1) use a 3rd party add-in e.g. from the Autodesk store 2) user Revit in adition to convert the rvt-file to ifc.   There has to be a possibility to include iProperties (please all of them, userdefinied, standard, instance) into an IFC-file.   Best regards, Kay Show More

Gang...we are in process of bringing a group of users from Solid Works to Inventor and they have complained numerous times that it would be really nice if Inventor acted the same way when they were constraining components in an assembly. The feature they are talking about is after you make the first selection in for a constraint, the first component automatically turns transparent so that you can see thru the part to the other side. With Inventor, you have to guess where the geometry might be for the second set, Free move the part prior to constraining, or roll you mouse wheel or choose out of the drop done and fingers crossed you hovered in the correct location. This can be slow and has numerous additional clicks, that SW does not have. Once the second selection is made and the constraint is accepted, the part removes the transparency and looks normal again.    This video demonstrates how SW works.... https://youtu.be/0myfFZ8jn64?si=LdxzJ4IFcKwqSZKJ   Best, Show More

The model tree already has a filter so let us add more options such as:   non-visible parts Sometimes in a large assembly it can be difficult to track down individual parts or subassemblies that have had their visibilities toggled off. grounded/ungrounded/joints/constraints/etc prevent assembly errors before they happen and narrow down existing errors Please reply with additional model tree filters you would find useful.   Show More

Dear Autodesk Community, I would like to share an idea that I believe is crucial for improving the efficiency of Model States in Inventor. This enhancement could significantly streamline workflows and reduce complexity when managing multiple configurations within a single model. Summary Inventor should allow Model States in a parent part to reference specific configurations (such as different Solids or Model States) from derived parts. Currently, this linkage is not possible, making configuration management and variant design unnecessarily complex. Current Limitation Derived parts can be created, but Model States or individual Solids from those derived parts cannot be selectively linked to Model States in the parent part. As a result, switching variants in the parent part via Model States is impossible when those variants depend on different derived configurations. This leads to redundant files, workarounds (iLogic scripts, multiple derivations, suppression hacks), and higher maintenance effort. Proposed Solution Allow Model States in the parent part to map to Model States or Solids in derived parts. When switching a Model State in the parent part, the corresponding configuration in the derived part should update automatically. https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/issue-with-model-states-in-derived-parts-multi-body-skeleton/td-p/13917961 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-programming-forum/is-it-possible-to-control-model-states-of-a-derived-part-via/m-p/13919823#M178273 Show More

When inserting a component into an assembly using the Place command, the orientation of the component is displayed using coloured x, y and z coordinate axes before placement. Would it be possible to display the colour of the axis in the menu (right-click) on the corresponding button? This would simplify orientation and enable faster placement. Show More

Why can't I select standard iProperties or user-defined iProperties when creating text in an IAM sketch? The assembly contains both types! Or rather, why is the type selection option different within an IPT compared to the IAM? - Selection in the IAM (see image 3) - Selection in the IPT (see image 2 ) If you create a "preset" in an IPT with a property from the standard iProperties, this preset is available in the IAM and inserts the property correctly. (see image 1) Therefore, we assume this is a bug or an incomplete functionality issue with the text selection dialog in the IAM.       for mor Information see: Support Case No:25011877 Show More

Inventor 2026 introduced the excellent "Replace Reference" right-click command for 2D/3D sketch projections, allowing users to swap broken/lost projected geometry (arcs, lines, circles) with new references without deleting/recreating them. This preserves all downstream constraints and feature references perfectly. However, there is no iLogic or API exposure to this functionality. Attempting programmatic workarounds (delete old projection and adding new one) breaks all subsequent features that reference the original sketch entity, as the internal entity ID change. Show More

Hello, Some companies are trying to use so-called paperless documentation. Autodesk Inventor offers tools such as 3D Annotations...but unfortunately, when generating .dwf previews or view in Vault, 3D annotations are static(they do not change in relation to rotation in space, even though this works in Inventor). The same applies to the .dwf viewer.   Please vote for future improvements. Thank you.   STANISLAV ŠUCHA CAD/CAM Consultant Arkance Systems SK s.r.o.   Show More

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bonjour, Je poste ici une suggestion en anglais afin qu’elle soit lisible par un maximum d’utilisateurs et par l’équipe de développement Autodesk. N’hésitez pas à me contacter si vous souhaitez des précisions en français. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Description: In Swiss watchmaking we manufacture micro screws with very tight tolerances based on the NIHS standard. We populate Inventor’s Thread.xlsx with NIHS Min/Max diameters (Major, Pitch, Minor) for external and internal threads, and use these values for both the 3D geometry and the thread representation on drawings.   The same behavior is not limited to NIHS – the issue also appears when using ISO or ANSI thread tables with Min/Max values in Thread.xlsx.   Currently, when both Min and Max are defined in Thread.xlsx, Inventor’s internal logic does not correctly use these values to position the thread root lines on drawings. The graphical representation often does not reflect the possible minimum diameter from the standard. For micro screws, this can lead to wrong under-head sections, broken screws during automatic tightening, and potentially very high production losses, even though parts are fully within NIHS / ISO / ANSI tolerance.   Requested enhancement: Correctly evaluate and use the Min/Max diameters from Thread.xlsx for: the thread / tap geometry, and the thread root representation on drawings. Add a setting (in thread or drawing style) to choose whether the representation is based on Min, Max, or a derived value. Clearly document this behavior so users working with standards like NIHS 06-10, ISO metric threads or ANSI threads understand how Thread.xlsx drives the drawing.   UI suggestion (see attached image): For external threads, show Major / Pitch / Minor Dia with Max/Min values coming from the External Thread part of Thread.xlsx. For internal threads (taps), show the same fields, this time based on the Internal Thread part of Thread.xlsx.   UI suggestion   The attached image (UI suggestion) illustrates this proposed UI and the link between the dialog and Thread.xlsx.   Benefits : Safer design for companies manufacturing their own screws in high-precision fields (watchmaking, medical, etc.). Reduced risk of costly scrap due to misleading thread graphics.   Visual example (attached screw drawings) : The two attached drawings illustrate the problem on a S 0.80 screw:   Current Inventor formula The under-head relief is defined as Ø0.550, and the thread root used by Inventor’s internal formula is about Ø0.561. This is what the user sees today on the drawing: a relatively “safe” remaining section under the head. Real worst-case according to the standard The same screw is shown, but this time the thread root corresponds to the minimum Minor diameter (≈ Ø0.531) defined by the NIHS / ISO / ANSI table, which is still fully within tolerance for the screw manufacturer. The effective remaining section under the head is much smaller than what Inventor’s current representation suggests, which can lead to head breakage during automatic tightening (for example). In other words, the drawing produced by Inventor (image 1) does not visually represent the real worst-case part that we actually receive (image 2), even though it is fully within the specified NIHS / ISO / ANSI tolerance.   Benefits : Safer design for companies manufacturing their own screws in high-precision fields (watchmaking, medical, etc.). Reduced risk of costly scrap due to misleading thread graphics. Better alignment of Inventor with real industrial standards such as NIHS, ISO and ANSI. Show More

Users have requested that the marking function be available in the assembly environment as well. Currently, marking is only available in IPT. The reason for this is that areas, such as sketches or text, should be marked on the surface during assembly.   Show More