The theory so far (from the little that Karl, Charles and I have talked) is
that we'll provide a container for YOUR iParts so both of your worries will
be on YOUR shoulders...
I wouldn't think of suggesting that everyone uses the same part #,
description etc... wouldn't that be silly
--
Sean Dotson, PE
http://www.sdotson.com
Check the Inventor FAQ for most common questions
http://www.sdotson.com/faq.html
-----------------------------------------
"Richard Hinterhoeller" wrote in message
news:3DFF9A95.5080707@hfx.eastlink.ca...
> Sean:
>
> Sounds great.
>
> Two considerations I'd suggest:
>
> 1/ It would be nice to standardize on the 'Extrusion' direction. My
> preference is in the X axis because it inserts almost as nicely into a
> Z-up assembly (metric default) as into a Y-up assembly (English default).
>
> 2/ How can each company's part numbers be used? I'm finding iParts to
> be an extremely powerful tool for looking up the part numbers in that I
> select the appropriate iPart and it supplies the number to the BOM. If
> iDrop parts can't do this for me, they're a non-starter.
>
> Richard
>
> Sean Dotson wrote:
> > Nope. iParts and the content library are two different things....stick
with
> > the iParts. A few of us are working on a way to make them idrop-aable
in a
> > nice interface..
> >
> > --
> > Sean Dotson, PE
> > http://www.sdotson.com
> > Check the Inventor FAQ for most common questions
> > http://www.sdotson.com/faq.html
> > -----------------------------------------
> > "Dustin Conklin" wrote in message
> > news:A2C3B5683882933055572B22864DF8DF@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> >
> >>Is there any way to add Iparts to the content library that I have
already
> >>drawn. So that I could use the I drop feature with my Iparts.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>