Community
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"tap90291" <I
href="mailto:tpritchett@lg.com">tpritchett@lg.com> wrote in message
href="news:f17d394.-1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f17d394.-1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
have a conveyor frame with 4" chanel sides with a 1x1 angle welded to the
botom of the chanel (leg fillets tangent to the chanel flange) sitting in a
vee groove caster. Will inventor allow me to use a transitionl (or other)
constraint to model the motion between the caster and the angle iron guide.
If so how do I do this.
TAP
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"Mark Smith" <
href="mailto:mark.smith@airgage.spx.com">mark.smith@airgage.spx.com>
wrote in message
href="news:CCF0B7056D5E579AC27E776F5D7A5C90@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:CCF0B7056D5E579AC27E776F5D7......
href="http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/item?siteID=123112&id=3455244&linkID=3016308">http://u...
This link is from todays Manufacturing Toplines
for autodesk.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"Brian McElyea" <bmcelyea_at_mil-tec_dot_com> wrote in message
href="news:7450F3ECAA178B9958491301B34C8EA4@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:7450F3ECAA178B9958491301B34......
Not really related to transitional constraints,
but...
I read that earlier, and something towards the
end of the article caught my attention:
In the last bullet, Bill Fane says, "To
see how I did this, turn on the visibility of the Driver part. Note that if
you also turn off Enabled, the part does not contribute to mass calculations,
but its constraints are still active."
This has not been my experience (but oh, how I
wish it were!)... Just to make sure, I went into an assembly and checked
the mass. Then, I disabled a part and checked the mass. They were
the same - the only way I have been able to keep a part from contributing to
the mass calculations is to set it as reference.
So, does disabling a part supposed to truly
disable it from mass calculations, or was this just a goof on the author's
part?
-Brian
----------
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"Mark Smith" <
href="mailto:mark.smith@airgage.spx.com">mark.smith@airgage.spx.com>
wrote in message
href="news:CCF0B7056D5E579AC27E776F5D7A5C90@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:CCF0B7056D5E579AC27E776F5......
This link is from todays Manufacturing Toplines
for autodesk.
size=2>
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"Brian McElyea" <bmcelyea_at_mil-tec_dot_com> wrote in message
href="news:7450F3ECAA178B9958491301B34C8EA4@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:7450F3ECAA178B9958491301B34......
Not really related to transitional constraints,
but...
I read that earlier, and something towards the
end of the article caught my attention:
In the last bullet, Bill Fane says, "To
see how I did this, turn on the visibility of the Driver part. Note that if
you also turn off Enabled, the part does not contribute to mass calculations,
but its constraints are still active."
This has not been my experience (but oh, how I
wish it were!)... Just to make sure, I went into an assembly and checked
the mass. Then, I disabled a part and checked the mass. They were
the same - the only way I have been able to keep a part from contributing to
the mass calculations is to set it as reference.
So, does disabling a part supposed to truly
disable it from mass calculations, or was this just a goof on the author's
part?
-Brian
----------
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"Mark Smith" <
href="mailto:mark.smith@airgage.spx.com">mark.smith@airgage.spx.com>
wrote in message
href="news:CCF0B7056D5E579AC27E776F5D7A5C90@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:CCF0B7056D5E579AC27E776F5......
This link is from todays Manufacturing Toplines
for autodesk.
size=2>
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"PMiller" <
href="mailto:patrick.miller@techsoftware.com">patrick.miller@techsoftware.com>
wrote in message
href="news:EAA2449E8A3D641C796D69BC6B6493FC@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:EAA2449E8A3D641C796D69BC6B6......
Diabling the part does will not exclude it from
the mass calculations. If you RMB and go to properties of the part, go to the
"occurence" tabyou can turn on "Reference". This will exclude the part from
mass calcs.
size=2>