Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Transitional constraints

5 REPLIES 5
Reply
Message 1 of 6
tap90291
197 Views, 5 Replies

Transitional constraints

I have a conveyor frame with 4" chanel sides with a 1x1 angle welded to the botom of the chanel (leg fillets tangent to the chanel flange) sitting in a vee groove caster. Will inventor allow me to use a transitionl (or other) constraint to model the motion between the caster and the angle iron guide.
If so how do I do this.

TAP
5 REPLIES 5
Message 2 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: tap90291


 

This link is from todays Manufacturing Toplines for
autodesk.

 

Hope this helps

 

Mark Smith

SPX Air Gage Co.


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
I
have a conveyor frame with 4" chanel sides with a 1x1 angle welded to the
botom of the chanel (leg fillets tangent to the chanel flange) sitting in a
vee groove caster. Will inventor allow me to use a transitionl (or other)
constraint to model the motion between the caster and the angle iron guide.

If so how do I do this.

TAP

Message 3 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: tap90291

Not really related to transitional constraints,
but...

 

I read that earlier, and something towards the end
of the article caught my attention:

 

In the last bullet, Bill Fane says, "To see
how I did this, turn on the visibility of the Driver part. Note that if you also
turn off Enabled, the part does not contribute to mass calculations, but its
constraints are still active."

 

This has not been my experience (but oh, how I wish
it were!)...  Just to make sure, I went into an assembly and checked the
mass.  Then, I disabled a part and checked the mass.  They were the
same - the only way I have been able to keep a part from contributing to the
mass calculations is to set it as reference.

 

So, does disabling a part supposed to truly disable
it from mass calculations, or was this just a goof on the author's
part?

 

-Brian

 

----------


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">


 

This link is from todays Manufacturing Toplines
for autodesk.

 
Message 4 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: tap90291

Wasn't the whole tutorial about translational
constraints?

 

Mark Smith

SPX Air Gage Co.


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

Not really related to transitional constraints,
but...

 

I read that earlier, and something towards the
end of the article caught my attention:

 

In the last bullet, Bill Fane says, "To
see how I did this, turn on the visibility of the Driver part. Note that if
you also turn off Enabled, the part does not contribute to mass calculations,
but its constraints are still active."

 

This has not been my experience (but oh, how I
wish it were!)...  Just to make sure, I went into an assembly and checked
the mass.  Then, I disabled a part and checked the mass.  They were
the same - the only way I have been able to keep a part from contributing to
the mass calculations is to set it as reference.

 

So, does disabling a part supposed to truly
disable it from mass calculations, or was this just a goof on the author's
part?

 

-Brian

 

----------


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">


 

This link is from todays Manufacturing Toplines
for autodesk.


size=2>
 
Message 5 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: tap90291

Diabling the part does will not exclude it from the
mass calculations. If you RMB and go to properties of the part, go to the
"occurence" tabyou can turn on "Reference". This will exclude the part from mass
calcs.

 

Patrick Miller

Rand-IMAGINiT Technologies


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

Not really related to transitional constraints,
but...

 

I read that earlier, and something towards the
end of the article caught my attention:

 

In the last bullet, Bill Fane says, "To
see how I did this, turn on the visibility of the Driver part. Note that if
you also turn off Enabled, the part does not contribute to mass calculations,
but its constraints are still active."

 

This has not been my experience (but oh, how I
wish it were!)...  Just to make sure, I went into an assembly and checked
the mass.  Then, I disabled a part and checked the mass.  They were
the same - the only way I have been able to keep a part from contributing to
the mass calculations is to set it as reference.

 

So, does disabling a part supposed to truly
disable it from mass calculations, or was this just a goof on the author's
part?

 

-Brian

 

----------


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">


 

This link is from todays Manufacturing Toplines
for autodesk.


size=2>
 
Message 6 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: tap90291

That's what I thought...they can't even get their
tutorials right...all the misinformation is sickening.

 

-Brian

 

----------


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

Diabling the part does will not exclude it from
the mass calculations. If you RMB and go to properties of the part, go to the
"occurence" tabyou can turn on "Reference". This will exclude the part from
mass calcs.

size=2>

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report