I believe that can be done, but I use my shaded views on the same sheet with
multiple non-shaded dimensioned views. Also, those BMP views would not
update. Of course now that I think about it, the "cartoon" outline shaded
views with "bleed through" need to be cleaned up all over again after a
geometry change, so that may be an improvement in some cases. Certainly for
presentation only, it could help. Thanks.
Ed R
"KJohnson" wrote in message
news:FA5BC0A84A05E15DCF1560E6EAB02725@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Can you save as BMP and then print the BMP to a pdf or to the printer. I
> had a similar problem in 5.3 and shaded presentations. The trails would
> bleed throught. I wonder if they still do?
>
> Kathy Johnson
>
> "Ed Rasmussen" wrote in message
> news:2111B32D493371B9E14D9C61B86E1464@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > I hope and believe that this will be addressed in a service pack. It
> > certainly lowers the quality of the shaded views. I originally used
very
> > few shaded views, but have begun adding shaded isos to almost all my
> > drawings the last few months. To diminish the value of this is not
good.
> > However, my greater immediate problem with the shaded views is the
"bleed
> > through" of lines that should be hidden. They do not show in my view
> until
> > I print. Then apparently random lines pop up and make a mess of my
> printed
> > view. I can individually select those lines and turn off visibility,
but
> > this is time consuming and difficult because the lines do not show in
the
> > view. Does anyone have a better work around for this? Do I need to
> > eliminate the shading until this is fixed?
> >
> > Ed R
> >
> >
> >
> > "JGH" wrote in message
> > news:E305B1F1697E1AADBB4FCD4E735B3CE3@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > No good, I still want the 0.5 in hidden line views and the r5.3 shaded
> > > "style" had more like 0.25 than 0,35.
> > > I can`t change the lineweight down to that. I wan`t my drawings to
look
> > the
> > > same as they did in 5.3 without changing the standards....I guess this
> was
> > a
> > > bug in 5.3 that is now fixed in r6 ? If so they should have made it a
> > option
> > > instead.
> > >
> > > Jørgen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Laurence Yeandle" wrote in message
> > > news:59F697573040C3670A41833669A96C50@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > Sorry I meant drop the line weight down....... say from 0.5 to 0.35,
> > this
> > > > works fine for me. This should cut the cartoon's out to pro looking?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Laurence,
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > "JGH" wrote in message
> > > > news:CF255ACD278C8E7D0CFFA585601AC574@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > I want the lineweight on....
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Laurence Yeandle" wrote in message
> > > > > news:F0641EE36FF4A8289BAC1D2F05B729C4@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > Jørgen, Try changing your visible edges in :-
> > Format-Standards-Common,
> > > > > Drop
> > > > > > the line weight.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Laurence,
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "JGH" wrote in message
> > > > > > news:C05B3FE57F27F476B2387858601D5789@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > > (same post was in the original inventor discussion, but its
> > > important
> > > > > for
> > > > > > me
> > > > > > > to get this right. so I brought it here too)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Noticed the prints (with shaded views) comes out looking more
> > > > "cartoony"
> > > > > > > than in 5.3 ? The outlines are more defined with a bolder
line
> > than
> > > > > > > earlier. Same file in Inventor 5.3 looks normal...I use the
same
> > > > > templates
> > > > > > > etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why, and how to get back to normal ? Please fix in Sp1 - I
have
> > > > allready
> > > > > > > sent away hundreds of drawings in r5.3 style, if I now send a
> > > revision
> > > > > > done
> > > > > > > in r6 it don`t exactly "fit in" with the rest of the set if
you
> > see
> > > > what
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > mean.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jørgen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>