lol! I suppose you should charge extra for whatever that hatch is attached to and charge it out as 'extremely precision' or something of the similar.
Btw, I havent seen this on mine and use it all the time. It is quite funny tho 😉
Vlad, after using Inventor for a while and trying to track down reasons for assembly constraint failure, then numbers like that are common.
Why is Inventor so pedantic about numbers? .... lol
And Vlad, here's a challenge for you, try to measure that angle with your protractor .... lmfao!
Hi Vlad,
From where did you get the drawing? Created by you or received from someone? I\m curious whether did you enter value of 30 deg and then you found there 30.00022219255. Or you just received the drawing and check the hatching angle
-Jozef
I win! This was from a hatching of a section I just made. No changes made... straight from the Inventor Realm
Did anyone notice that the error in those two hatch pattern are exactly the opposite? If you add them together you get 90.00000000000000.
@jozef.dubaj wrote:Hi Vlad,
From where did you get the drawing? Created by you or received from someone? I\m curious whether did you enter value of 30 deg and then you found there 30.00022219255. Or you just received the drawing and check the hatching angle
-Jozef
Hi Jozef,
The drawings are my own. I see the wacky values when I change the hatch style.
It is happening in section views of assemblies.
First inventor converts the angle to radians then to fractional degrees then to decimal degrees, it then applies an analogous algorithm based on the colour of the 5th nearest star from earth multiplied by the deriviative of........
I get this too...it drives me nuts
Are you using a metric template, I am
I suspect that is where the issue comes from...inventor not quite knowing how to convert all the numbers properly so in the math that drives the auto hatch angle, there is a rounding issue.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.