Mirror feature bug?

[Anonymous]

I put an exapmle in IV-CF. If you mirror a threaded through hole so you can
show it tapped from both ends, the thread won't show up on the mirrored
side. If you change the feature to a blind hole and give it a depth that
goes through the part, it works. Am I missing something? I'd rather not use
a blind hole because the hole note will want to add a depth in rather than
'THRU'

--
Kevin Wehner

[Anonymous]

Add a thread to the other end (not a threaded hole) just like it would be done in the machining operations. J.D.

[Anonymous]

I know it can be done another way, but why would
this not work?

--
Kevin Wehner

style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

"JDMATHER" <jmather@pct.edu>
wrote in message
href="news:f17e9d5.0@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f17e9d5.0@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...

Add
a thread to the other end (not a threaded hole) just like it would be done in
the machining operations. J.D.

[Anonymous]

I tested this in the latest R8 build, and the thread mirrors. In the
meantime, applying a thread feature to the other side of the part is
probably the best workaround.

Loren Jahraus
Autodesk Inventor Workflow Team

"Kevin Wehner" wrote in message
news:01714514150CA9FC20F90BAA4B1ECD81@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> I know it can be done another way, but why would this not work?
>
> --
> Kevin Wehner
> "JDMATHER" wrote in message
news:f17e9d5.0@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Add a thread to the other end (not a threaded hole) just like it would
be done in the machining operations. J.D.

[Anonymous]

Thanks for checking it out.

I'm suprised you even mentioned R8. Is it still a while off?

--
Kevin Wehner
"Loren Jahraus (Autodesk)" wrote in message
news:EC87D95CEA31A3593A9977714D3F202F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> I tested this in the latest R8 build, and the thread mirrors. In the
> meantime, applying a thread feature to the other side of the part is
> probably the best workaround.
>
> Loren Jahraus
> Autodesk Inventor Workflow Team
>
> "Kevin Wehner" wrote in message
> news:01714514150CA9FC20F90BAA4B1ECD81@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > I know it can be done another way, but why would this not work?
> >
> > --
> > Kevin Wehner
> > "JDMATHER" wrote in message
> news:f17e9d5.0@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > Add a thread to the other end (not a threaded hole) just like it would
> be done in the machining operations. J.D.
>
>

[Anonymous]

In general, I can't talk about new functionality, but I can communicate that
a defect has been fixed. I am certainly not allowed to talk about release
dates.

Loren Jahraus
Autodesk Inventor Workflow Team


"Kevin Wehner" wrote in message
news:0FC49A6B03E64523D46687AA1ADD68D6@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Thanks for checking it out.
>
> I'm suprised you even mentioned R8. Is it still a while off?
>

[Anonymous]

I know...but there was a small chance that you'd slip up and forget about
all that before you had enough coffee.

--
Kevin Wehner
"Loren Jahraus (Autodesk)" wrote in message
news:EFB8A64CA8353201AD607DBDFD3570AE@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> In general, I can't talk about new functionality, but I can communicate
that
> a defect has been fixed. I am certainly not allowed to talk about release
> dates.
>
> Loren Jahraus
> Autodesk Inventor Workflow Team
>
>
> "Kevin Wehner" wrote in message
> news:0FC49A6B03E64523D46687AA1ADD68D6@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > Thanks for checking it out.
> >
> > I'm suprised you even mentioned R8. Is it still a while off?
> >
>
>