I do not think that I am alone in my request to retain the relationship to the original in a mirrored assembly, of which seems like a simple enough of a concept by itself, but I will be more than happy to give an example. I really don't think a file is necessary.
A steel tower is usually a symmetrical object. Of which requires extensive detail to each of the potentially thousands of connections between the columns, beams, girders, and bracing. It seams only logical to design only half of the structure if both sides are going to be exactly the same only opposite hand.
I'm not sure if you are aware of the design process, but to summerize, we never know all the information in the beginning, and constant image communication of the evolving design is required, not only just in house but to our clients as well.
Assemble a frame (using frame generator). Create a mirrored derived part. Now you will need to combine the original frame half and the mirrored derived part together in another 'Top' assembly. Now create multiple LODs and veiw reps. You will notice the Derived part will not take on the LOD or the view rep of the Top assembly it will only represent the settings in the original frame file.
Now attempt to make a drawing view. Notice that all of the detail on the original side is available, and the derived side is more like an out line that omits the connection details.
If I mirror my assembly and it changes (which it will many times) I'll need to delete and re-mirror it. But if I've already created dwgs referrencing that view I now have to redo the drawing as well. I'm having a hard time seeing where that saves me any time from just using CAD.
I realize that software development takes time, it also takes feedback, and all I am asking for is a box to check to opt for associativity retention when creating a mirrored assembly. This would save me 1/2 of my time while still giving me all of the versatility of an assembly grouping.
P.S. thank you for your recant of 'gal'.