Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Dimension can not be solved

6 REPLIES 6
Reply
Message 1 of 7
Anonymous
606 Views, 6 Replies

Dimension can not be solved

I wanted to add a dimension to a hole center and I get this error dialog
that says the dimension can't be solved. Ther error recommends changing a
dimension value or a constraint so that it can be solved. Problem is there
is no sketch constraints or dimensions to this point.

Any ideas? I don't want to delete the point because I would then loose
contraints that are associated to this hole in the assembly.

Kirk
--
Inventor 7.0 sp1
Dell 4550
WinXP Pro
P4, 2.8 Ghz, 1G
Quadro 900 XGL
nVidia v6.14.10.4403
1280x1024, 32 bit
6 REPLIES 6
Message 2 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Redefining sketch fixed the problem. Don't understand why I would have to
be doing this.


"Kirk A." wrote in message
news:382B86E1CEE5611B86CE67817796E805@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> I wanted to add a dimension to a hole center and I get this error dialog
> that says the dimension can't be solved. Ther error recommends changing a
> dimension value or a constraint so that it can be solved. Problem is
there
> is no sketch constraints or dimensions to this point.
>
> Any ideas? I don't want to delete the point because I would then loose
> contraints that are associated to this hole in the assembly.
>
> Kirk
> --
> Inventor 7.0 sp1
> Dell 4550
> WinXP Pro
> P4, 2.8 Ghz, 1G
> Quadro 900 XGL
> nVidia v6.14.10.4403
> 1280x1024, 32 bit
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Message 3 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Kirk A. wrote:
> Redefining sketch fixed the problem. Don't understand why I would have to
> be doing this.
>
>

Sometimes IV just has moment where it forgets where it is, redefining
the sketch is a reminder.


--
Hal Gwin
Mechanical Designer
Xenogen

Dell Precision 650
Dual 2.66 GHz Xeon
1.5 GB DDR
Quadro4 900 XGL
nVidia 6.14.10.4351 drivers
Dell UltraSharp 19" LCD
Message 4 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

What I hate about these moments is that any projected geometry looses it
association. In order for the sketches to be correct, I have to go back and
redo them ($$$$).

Time consuming.


"Hal Gwin" wrote in message
news:FC333409B75947FF3723C4BD1BE3FD8E@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Kirk A. wrote:
> > Redefining sketch fixed the problem. Don't understand why I would have
to
> > be doing this.
> >
> >
>
> Sometimes IV just has moment where it forgets where it is, redefining
> the sketch is a reminder.
>
>
> --
> Hal Gwin
> Mechanical Designer
> Xenogen
>
> Dell Precision 650
> Dual 2.66 GHz Xeon
> 1.5 GB DDR
> Quadro4 900 XGL
> nVidia 6.14.10.4351 drivers
> Dell UltraSharp 19" LCD
>
Message 5 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Kirk A. wrote:
> What I hate about these moments is that any projected geometry looses it
> association. In order for the sketches to be correct, I have to go back and
> redo them ($$$$).
>
> Time consuming.
>

That, and the fact that it does not always update when the other part
changes, are the primary reasons I rarely use projected geometry. If I
do need it, I usually project it, then change it to Normal geometry and
constrain and dimension accordingly.

--
Hal Gwin
Mechanical Designer
Xenogen

Dell Precision 650
Dual 2.66 GHz Xeon
1.5 GB DDR
Quadro4 900 XGL
nVidia 6.14.10.4351 drivers
Dell UltraSharp 19" LCD
Message 6 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

If you do change it to normal geometry then whats the purpose of using parametric solid modeling software. I mean whats the purpose of a cosmetic weld? Whats the purpose of local and global updates and rebuilds all if its truly a parametric software
Message 7 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

ohunome wrote:
> If you do change it to normal geometry then whats the purpose of using
> parametric solid modeling software. I mean whats the purpose of a
> cosmetic weld? Whats the purpose of local and global updates and
> rebuilds all if its truly a parametric software

The fact that I change projected geometry to normal geometry (that is
constrained and dimensioned) does not negate the parametrics of the
part. The fact that I choose to edit multiple parts is my choice. It
is partly driven by the software, it is also driven by the fact that I
will reuse parts in different instruments and replace parts that are
redesigned during prototyping. Both of the latter cases function far
more efficiently if I modify the projected geometry to normal geometry.

--
Hal Gwin
Mechanical Designer
Xenogen

Dell Precision 650
Dual 2.66 GHz Xeon
1.5 GB DDR
Quadro4 900 XGL
nVidia 6.14.10.4351 drivers
Dell UltraSharp 19" LCD

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report