That's what I thought, but wasn't sure.
~Larry
"Sean Dotson" wrote in message
news:E60A9BBA05D2A60BB6704CA0EA5719D4@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> yes it is. I am saying I have SP1 on my Xp machine and SP3 on my Win2K
> machine
>
> --
> ----
> Sean Dotson
> http://www.sdotson.com
> ...sleep is for the weak...
> ----
> "Larry Caldwell" wrote in message
> news:A89959F3ACF614ECBA2DCF5E44E8A4DF@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > W2K's on SP3, no?
> > ~Larry
> >
> > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > news:088B6B78C4C6C51A7E7F93CE514F1CB1@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > I had SP1 on before I installed R6 final and I am seeing a lot less
> > problems
> > > than my Win2K machine.
> > >
> > > --
> > > ----
> > > Sean Dotson
> > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > ...sleep is for the weak...
> > > ----
> > > "Kerwin Kassulker" wrote in message
> > > news:B438A4DB3EA471C08A5C156635394799@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > I took the advice posted earlier from "rstadler". I was
experiencing
> > > > extremely slow refresh rates in R6 when rotating 3D models that were
> > > > migrated from 5.3.
> > > >
> > > > After only installing Win XP SP1 the performance remains the same...
> but
> > > > then of course, when you uninstall R6, and then re-install... the
> > > > performance comes back to the levels of 5.3!
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>