Inventor Engineer-to-Order

Reply
Contributor
intentdesign
Posts: 13
Registered: ‎10-06-2012
Message 1 of 4 (111 Views)

IvSheetMetalPart very time consuming

111 Views, 3 Replies
01-24-2013 03:13 AM

Why do IvSheetMetalPart based designs slow down my ETO application so much? Is there a way to tune my application?

 

I work with Inventor ETO 2013 R2 / Windows 7 64 bit

 

Regards

Dieter

Employee
JackGregory
Posts: 189
Registered: ‎03-06-2006
Message 2 of 4 (109 Views)

Re: IvSheetMetalPart very time consuming

01-24-2013 03:55 AM in reply to: intentdesign

Dieter:

Are there a lot of punch patterns?

Can you file a issue with ADN and send them a sample?  This has come up before, but we need to see the case to give better info.

 

--Jack Gregory

 

Contributor
intentdesign
Posts: 13
Registered: ‎10-06-2012
Message 3 of 4 (89 Views)

Re: IvSheetMetalPart very time consuming

01-25-2013 08:14 AM in reply to: intentdesign
Hi Jack, The issue is the same without punch patterns. I filed the issue with ADN and sent the attached sample. ?I have attached a sample design to explain the issue. In this design you can choose a sheet design or a no_sheet design. No_sheet design is 10 times faster than the sheet design.. In my ETO application there are a great number of sheet parts with a lot of holes (IvSMPartPunchFeature). The IvShettMetalParts are extremely time consuming. How can we tune that. ? Regards Dieter cid:578190516@25012013-2D12 Mit freundlichem Gru? Dieter Meuthen IntentDesign Ingenieurb?ro f?r Regelbasierte Konstruktion Tel: +49 (0)2473 / 689488 Mobil: +49 (0)1705 / 450872 dieter.meuthen@intentdesign.de www.intentdesign.de
Employee
JackGregory
Posts: 189
Registered: ‎03-06-2006
Message 4 of 4 (70 Views)

Re: IvSheetMetalPart very time consuming

01-28-2013 06:27 AM in reply to: intentdesign

Yes, when I said "punch patterns" I meant "lots of punch features".  These are known to be time-consuming.  We are gathering recommendations.  One recommendation is around the flat patterns.  If you are not planning to use the Flat Patterns, you can delete them in the factory parts, and re-adopt IPTs. That will give some time gain, because the Flat Patterns updates tend to be slow.

 

If you just make a change in Inventor (without Intent/ETO) on the IPT, a simple change takes about 3 seconds, which is fairly slow.  ETO can't make Inventor faster.  If you have many such parts, you are going to be taking that kind of time per part.  Of course, once they are cached, they are almost instaneous.

 

One strategy is to avoid the slow stuff with conditionals until you need the full monty.

 

--Jack Gregory

You are not logged in.

Log into access your profile, ask and answer questions, share ideas and more. Haven't signed up yet? Register

Announcements
Manufacturing Community
The Manufacturing Community provides additional access to tips, tutorials, blogs and networking with peers.

Need installation help?

Start with some of our most frequented solutions to get help installing your software.

Ask the Community


Inventor Exchange Apps

Created by the community for the community, Autodesk Exchange Apps for Autodesk Inventor helps you achieve greater speed, accuracy, and automation from concept to manufacturing.

Connect with Inventor

Twitter

Facebook

Blogs

Pinterest

Youtube