Installation & Licensing
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
*Deal, Tom
Windows 98 vs Windows 2000
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
83 Views, 2 Replies
04-12-2000 06:22 AM
Does anybody have experience and/or benchmarks comparing Windows 98 vs
Windows 2000 for running AutoCAD. Any opinions or thoughts would be greatly
appreciated.
--
Tom Deal
Cad Manager
Sebree & Associates, Architects
Phone 317-272-7800
Fax 317-272-7808
http://www.sebreearchitects.com/
Windows 2000 for running AutoCAD. Any opinions or thoughts would be greatly
appreciated.
--
Tom Deal
Cad Manager
Sebree & Associates, Architects
Phone 317-272-7800
Fax 317-272-7808
http://www.sebreearchitects.com/
*Nehls, Kevin
Re: Windows 98 vs Windows 2000
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-12-2000 09:08 AM in reply to:
*Deal, Tom
No benchmarks in speed, but Win 2000 (also known as NT 5.0) is much more
stable. I have heard some people having problems with AutoCAD 2000 and Win
2000, but I have also heard other people raving about it. You may want to
check out the autocad.2000general NG. You will likely find more people that
have tried this.
--
Kevin Nehls
remove -ns- for direct reply
Tom Deal wrote in message ...
Does anybody have experience and/or benchmarks comparing Windows 98 vs
Windows 2000 for running AutoCAD. Any opinions or thoughts would be greatly
appreciated.
--
Tom Deal
Cad Manager
Sebree & Associates, Architects
Phone 317-272-7800
Fax 317-272-7808
http://www.sebreearchitects.com/
stable. I have heard some people having problems with AutoCAD 2000 and Win
2000, but I have also heard other people raving about it. You may want to
check out the autocad.2000general NG. You will likely find more people that
have tried this.
--
Kevin Nehls
remove -ns- for direct reply
Tom Deal wrote in message ...
Does anybody have experience and/or benchmarks comparing Windows 98 vs
Windows 2000 for running AutoCAD. Any opinions or thoughts would be greatly
appreciated.
--
Tom Deal
Cad Manager
Sebree & Associates, Architects
Phone 317-272-7800
Fax 317-272-7808
http://www.sebreearchitects.com/
*Stein, Dave
Re: Windows 98 vs Windows 2000
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-23-2000 09:10 AM in reply to:
*Deal, Tom
Tom,
I'm running Acad 2000 on a machine that multi-boots into Win95, NT Server
4.0, and Windows 2000 Professional. It's a P133 w/96 MB RAM (go ahead,
laugh, ha!). I can't see any difference in performance across any of them
EXCEPT:
When something hangs, I can kill and recover much easier in NT and 2000 than
in Win95/98.
Dave
"Tom Deal" wrote in message
news:eefe828.-1@WebX.SaUCah8kaAW...
> Does anybody have experience and/or benchmarks comparing Windows 98 vs
> Windows 2000 for running AutoCAD. Any opinions or thoughts would be
greatly
> appreciated.
>
> --
> Tom Deal
> Cad Manager
> Sebree & Associates, Architects
> Phone 317-272-7800
> Fax 317-272-7808
> http://www.sebreearchitects.com/
>
I'm running Acad 2000 on a machine that multi-boots into Win95, NT Server
4.0, and Windows 2000 Professional. It's a P133 w/96 MB RAM (go ahead,
laugh, ha!). I can't see any difference in performance across any of them
EXCEPT:
When something hangs, I can kill and recover much easier in NT and 2000 than
in Win95/98.
Dave
"Tom Deal"
news:eefe828.-1@WebX.SaUCah8kaAW...
> Does anybody have experience and/or benchmarks comparing Windows 98 vs
> Windows 2000 for running AutoCAD. Any opinions or thoughts would be
greatly
> appreciated.
>
> --
> Tom Deal
> Cad Manager
> Sebree & Associates, Architects
> Phone 317-272-7800
> Fax 317-272-7808
> http://www.sebreearchitects.com/
>
