style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"rfeineis" <Is
href="mailto:rfeineis@hotmail.com">rfeineis@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
href="news:f19272d.-1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f19272d.-1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
anyone out there running a thin client (ALL software is at the server)
installation of AutoCAD 2004 as compared to a thick client installation (all
software is local and only the license manager is at the server)?
If so, are you having any performance issues?
Why did you decide to go with the thin client installation?
Does this type of installation help with managing patches and other
maintenance issues?
Thanks!
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"JayDaniels" <Autodesk
href="mailto:a369258@hotmail.com">a369258@hotmail.com> wrote in message
href="news:f19272d.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f19272d.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
will not talk about or support thin client. A thin client installation would
make tons of sense for portability and central managment.
I've contacted
Autodesk consulting with checkbook in hand and they will not even consider
investigating a solution. I have been told by Autodesk consulting that there
will *NEVER* be a thin client solution for Autocad.
They don't even understand what thin client is or how anyone could have a
legitimate need for it.
99% of all my issues with Autodesk revolve around licensing or
authentication. Autodesk is too afraid that someone will use their software
without paying for it. There are other ways to protect against software piracy
without disrupting workflow so badly.
Support for licensing issues should be available free of charge.
In addtion, if someone would respond to my question regarding the error on
my ALM server I would appreciate it.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"JayDaniels" <Autodesk
href="mailto:a369258@hotmail.com">a369258@hotmail.com> wrote in message
href="news:f19272d.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f19272d.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
will not talk about or support thin client. A thin client installation would
make tons of sense for portability and central managment.
I've contacted
Autodesk consulting with checkbook in hand and they will not even consider
investigating a solution. I have been told by Autodesk consulting that there
will *NEVER* be a thin client solution for Autocad.
They don't even understand what thin client is or how anyone could have a
legitimate need for it.
99% of all my issues with Autodesk revolve around licensing or
authentication. Autodesk is too afraid that someone will use their software
without paying for it. There are other ways to protect against software piracy
without disrupting workflow so badly.
Support for licensing issues should be available free of charge.
In addtion, if someone would respond to my question regarding the error on
my ALM server I would appreciate it.