Greg said:
>Plus they require every user of ACAD to have a seat of their standards
> checker. I really wanted a couple of seats per plant so people can start
> switching old drawings to the new standards.
Greg, I spoke with a person that works at ProSosft and was told that there
is no need to have a license for every seat. You can have as many or as few
as you need. Everything else is true though. From what I have seen of it, it
looks worth it.
--
kenSwitzer
Opportunities are never lost
Someone will take the ones you miss
"Greg Alford" wrote in message
news:803BC6BD01425D364CD4F0797F45EFCD@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> "kswitzer" wrote in message
> news:52171F0A7BD47C4F371C91EBA6EB9E0C@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > NetSPEX is a good product.
> > PROSOFT puts a lot of effort into making the customer happy.
> > I have seen demos of it and like it what I have seen. I can not get my
> > company to spring for it or else I would have. Hey, we (I have only been
> > here a year) are just now finalizing our standards. I can't expect the
> > world.
>
> I talked to one of their sales reps. Netspex looks really good but it is
> expensive. They require $3,000 for a mandatory central server right off
the
> bat. Plus they require every user of ACAD to have a seat of their
standards
> checker. I really wanted a couple of seats per plant so people can start
> switching old drawings to the new standards.
>
>