On a related note, there have been some requests for XREF stripping (i.e.
changing absolute paths to relative paths) so project teams can work in a
more dynamic environment. I think there's definitely some value in the
not-widely-known-or-understood XREF tool that comes with the ProjectPoint
arx mini-client, even though it apparently only works in ACAD 2000 and
higher.
Has anybody on this board used this XREF tool?
Steve
"Scott Sheppard" wrote in message
news:3F0A8D90AC4FB971A524278F23999A6D@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> When ProjectPoint 1.0 was launched, we included what we called "an AutoCAD
> Mini-Client." The mini-client is sort of like a miniature version of the
> ProjectPoint client in that it has fewer functions. The mini-client
> manifests itself as a "ProjectPoint" pull down menu in AutoCAD.
>
> ProjectPoint 3.0 features WebDAV support. By supporting the WebDAV
internet
> standard, members can open and save files from/to Buzzsaw sites without
> using ProjectPoint or the mini-client. Users can use the normal AutoCAD
open
> and save dialogs. Given this, do we still need the AutoCAD mini-client
> moving forward? The deployment of ProjectPoint 3.0 is set for September
14.
> We are then moving on to ProjectPoint 3.5. I would love to drop support
for
> the mini-client and focus our efforts on other features, such as user
> management for large sites.
>
> How many of you still use R14? Although I personally worked on that
release
> and it will always have a special place in my heart, Autodesk has obited
> support for R14 as of January 2002. So if there aren't many R14 users out
> there, we probably can drop support for the mini-client. Now is the time
to
> speak. I welcome your replies. This is not a done deal. Hearing from real
> customers who really use the product really helps.
>
>