Autodesk Simulation Mechanical and Multiphysics
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Plate Vs Brick
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
While performing a modal analysis on a sheet metal assembly, the model was meshed with plate elements. A second analysis was performed with the same geometry,but with brick elements. The results between the plate elements and brick elements is quite different. Can someone give me an idea why this would be?
Re: Plate Vs Brick
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I am going to take a guess that the frequencies from the brick model were higher. That can be explained by the stiffness of brick elements in a bending mode. Brick models with bending usually need more than one element through the thickness to accurately capture the bending. (You may be able to compensate for that issue if you include the midside nodes for the brick parts. That setting is under the Element Definition.)
If the plate model has higher frequencies, then something is wrong in the setup. Either the weight of the models is different, or the boundary conditions are different.
John Holtz, P.E.
Senior User Experience Designer, Simulation
Autodesk, Inc.
Current version of Mechanical & Multiphysics: 2013 SP1 (2013.01.00.0012 28-Jun-2012)
Re: Plate Vs Brick
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
You're correct - the brick model did have higher frequencies. I'll revise the mesh number of elements through the thickness. Thanks for your help!
